Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: "Dennis Hilberg, Jr." <timekeeper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:53:01 -0800
David J Taylor wrote:
Brian Utterback wrote:
[]
Which is why NTP prefers the source with the smallest delay. The
system I am using has servers whose delays are 51ms to 94. I can't
find any closer. On my company LAN, the delays range from 16ms to
87ms. The offsets of all these servers agree to within 9ms. Sure, I
am not going to get sub-millisecond from that, but I think it is probably
more typical than your set-up.
Brian Utterback
Brian,
I know this is supposed to happen, but I recall seeing behaviour some time ago where a server with a little more jitter and much more delay was preferred, almost as if it was the jitter/offset which was the measure rather than offset itself. I ended up adding a "prefer" qualifier.
Cheers,
David
Doesn't ntpd choose a peer based on stratum also? Maybe that was the issue there.
--
Dennis Hilberg, Jr. \ timekeeper(at)dennishilberg(dot)com
NTP Server Information: \ http://saturn.dennishilberg.com/ntp.php
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: David J Taylor
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- References:
- strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Unruh
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: root
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: David L. Mills
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Unruh
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Brian Utterback
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Unruh
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Danny Mayer
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Unruh
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Danny Mayer
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: David L. Mills
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Unruh
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: David L. Mills
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Unruh
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Brian Utterback
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Maarten Wiltink
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: Brian Utterback
- Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- From: David J Taylor
- strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- Prev by Date: Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- Next by Date: Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- Previous by thread: Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- Next by thread: Re: strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|