Re: Poll interval vs. reachability register
- From: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David Woolley)
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:46:35 +0100
In article <9Jydner9uKY5tqnbnZ2dnUVZ_tCtnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Dennis Hilberg Jr <dont@xxxxxxx> wrote:
So, no one knows if ntpd increases the polling interval of a server if that
particular server has a reachability of zero?
From what I can work out, from the version 3 documentation, the pollinterval is forced to minpoll if there is a total loss of connectivity and
ramps down to that if the last two polls have failed. It only goes up if
the server isn't the current system peer and the responses are valid (or
it it is the system peer and the quality measures indicate an increase).
If you have a firewall blocking returns, I think you could exceed the
sustained poll rate needed to be considered abusive.
.
- References:
- Poll interval vs. reachability register
- From: Dennis Hilberg Jr
- Re: Poll interval vs. reachability register
- From: Dennis Hilberg Jr
- Poll interval vs. reachability register
- Prev by Date: Re: Poll interval vs. reachability register
- Next by Date: Oddity Between A Couple Local LAN Sources
- Previous by thread: Re: Poll interval vs. reachability register
- Next by thread: Re: Poll interval vs. reachability register
- Index(es):