Re: ntp linux daemon drift apart from Windows Net Time Server



DavidO wrote:
Hi:
I am trying to synchronize a linux (ntp version 4) box to an NT server
(w32tm).

That's not a good thing to do. The NT server is running SNTP and not NTP.

I set up the registry keys of my second unit as follows:
- The windows XP box is a server.
- The windows XP box takes time from: Public reliable external source.
(216.34.94.18, or time.windows.com).


What's reliable about it. It's getting its time from a single source and
assumes that it's right and it checks about twice? a day. That's no way
to run an NTP server.


Now, when I run the ntpd in my linux box, the unit receives packets
from the window box but it looks like the clock filter is rejecting the
packet and it does not update the linux box.

Not surprising considering that you are only using one server and it has
no way of knowing how reliable the returned NTP time is.

When running in ntpd -d, I get the following messages:


You didn't say what version you are using.


The dispersion, the jitter, and the offset levels start increasing.
When I run ntpq -p, it shows:

remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
jitter
==============================================================================
192.168.10.246 207.46.232.189 3 u 5 64 3 0.437 -15.273
4.956

The linux box can see the windows box but the linux box NEVER
synchronizes with the other one.
After a while the linux start drifting apart.

That's what the above is telling you.


I have been reading different articles and I have tried to modified ntp
configurations from both sides without any success. I will really
appreciate (it is really needed for my company) any help from anybody,


Start by setting up your linux box with NTP pointing to 4-5 external NTP
servers and forget about windows. If necessary you can later point the
windows box to the linux box. You should never be doing it the other way
round unless you are running NTP on the windows box.

Danny
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Future of IT in Lebanon
    ... It's the same Linux code base. ... Microsoft Office on a Windows server, it will install and run fine, the main ...
    (soc.culture.lebanon)
  • Re: Question about Red Hat Linux Enterprise
    ... we have is running Windows 2000 Server ... Luckily running Apache + MySQL on a Linux system is not a lot ... MySQL database and injecting it back into the MySQL installation ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Sweet Success
    ... Let's continue to assume that I prefer Windows to anything else: ... neither Linux nor Windows may be the answer. ... While it may well be initially less expensive to install a Linux-based ... of Linux simultaneously, along with Windows Server, AIX, and OS/400. ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] 70 million computers are using Windows 98 right now
    ... Linux is definitely not a natural migration pathway. ... Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Mac OS X seem to work pretty ... > desktop to server. ... But then the persons across the sea just can't install ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Benutzerkontenverwaltung mit Win 2003 Server - Teil 2
    ... und dann bin ich über Solaris zur ersten 30-Disketten-Version Linux ... Server auch keine grafische Oberfläche, der vi ist halt mein bester ... Und das ganze geht schon in Ansätzen seit Windows NT so ... > Unternehmensnetzwerk unter Unix administrieren könnte. ...
    (microsoft.public.de.german.windows.server.networking)