Re: ntpdate steps 86400 seconds
- From: "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:39:39 -0400
K.Dinh.P wrote:
"John Pettitt" <jpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:433CE24A.3040305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxThen look in the sntp subdirectory for a much smaller program. While sntp lacks many of the features of ntpd, it should be far superior to ntpdate and cron.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
K.Dinh.P wrote:
I have a question concerning ntpdate. I synchronize to a timeserver using crontab with ntpdate v4.1.1. The syslog is shown below:
[snip]
Why are you using ntpdate instead of ntpd?
Beacuse the precision with ntpd is too large on the single board hardware I´m using.
.
- References:
- ntpdate steps 86400 seconds
- From: K.Dinh.P
- Re: ntpdate steps 86400 seconds
- From: John Pettitt
- Re: ntpdate steps 86400 seconds
- From: K.Dinh.P
- ntpdate steps 86400 seconds
- Prev by Date: Re: ntpdate steps 86400 seconds
- Next by Date: Re: NTP for dummies
- Previous by thread: Re: ntpdate steps 86400 seconds
- Next by thread: Re: ntpdate steps 86400 seconds
- Index(es):