An archetecture question....
- From: kinard@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Matt Kinard)
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:59:36 GMT
Okay, so here's the architecture we're looking at:
A redundant pair of stratum 2 servers (call them A and B) located in close phyiscal proximity to one another that will be serving time to a group of hosts across a high-speed WAN. There is also an addional low-stratum server (call him C) located on another WAN that I could use as a back-up in the event of a communication loss to A and B (If I lose comms to one, I'll likely lose comms to both). So what I've got is:
C------------------------
|
|
A------\ |
| \ |
| | ------------------WAN-------------------Router/host
| /
B-------/
Please admire my 733t ASCII skillz.
The configuration (on a Cisco Router) will look similar to:
/server A prefer server B prefer server C
/I know that this is a long way from an optimal configuration, but can you all see any glaring issues with the configuration? Could you suggest a better alternative? I've got a co-worker that is conviced that if C offers up a time that is radically different from A and B, we'll have problems. Any thoughts?
Thanks a million,
-- -------------------------------------- Matt Kinard Information Systems Security Engineer Raytheon IIS -- Garland Phone: 972-205-6947 Pager: 888-321-7059 --------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An archetecture question....
- From: John Pettitt
- Re: An archetecture question....
- From: Brian Utterback
- Re: An archetecture question....
- Prev by Date: Re: Post processing of NTP data...
- Next by Date: Re: MD5
- Previous by thread: MD5
- Next by thread: Re: An archetecture question....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|