Re: Servers just doen't work (after following the troubleshooting page)
- From: per@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Per Hedeland)
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:44:59 +0000 (UTC)
In article <Pine.LNX.4.62.0509281201520.10217@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> S P
Arif Sahari Wibowo <arifsaha@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Per Hedeland wrote:
>> I.e. if the address in question *is* bound to a socket, the
>> bug will not occur - and the OP claimed that ntpd *did* have
>> all the IP addresses bound (but I suspect he may be mistaken).
>
>You are correct. I misunderstood you. I thought you meant that
>each address is not listed more than once. In fact, the
>secondary IPs was not listed at all. Giving -L to the ntpd
>indeed make it listen to all IPs. So indeed it may work with my
>original setup?
Yes. Actually I'm running that very version of ntpd in a commercial
product, using -L to get it to serve time on a "virtual" IP address for
a purpose very similar to what you wanted. But while it makes sense in
that particular context, I'm not sure it does in a general NTP
server/service setup (the product in question has nothing to do with
NTP, it's just an "internal" function there).
>Is there any cost associated on listening to secondary / virtual
>IPs?
Not significant in "normal" cases I'd say, and whether they're secondary
/ virtual or not is irrelevant. I think part of the "controversy" around
this arose due to people running ntpd on web servers that had a
gazillion "virtual" IP addresses for "virtual hosting", and having no
interest in having ntpd listen on all of those. Watching for packets on
a gazillion sockets does have performance and general resource
consumption significance, in fact on some platforms ntpd might get into
serious trouble by trying.
--Per Hedeland
per@xxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Re: Servers just doen't work (after following the troubleshooting page)
- From: S P Arif Sahari Wibowo
- Re: Servers just doen't work (after following the troubleshooting page)
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: Servers just doen't work (after following the troubleshooting page)
- From: Per Hedeland
- Re: Servers just doen't work (after following the troubleshooting page)
- From: S P Arif Sahari Wibowo
- Re: Servers just doen't work (after following the troubleshooting page)
- Prev by Date: Re: Servers just doen't work (after following the troubleshooting page)
- Next by Date: Using GPS as a reference clock for NTP?
- Previous by thread: Re: Servers just doen't work (after following the troubleshooting page)
- Next by thread: Re: Servers just doen't work (after following the troubleshooting page)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|