RE: WHy is this common syntax failing?
- From: ocarter@xxxxxxxxxxx ("Owen Carter")
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:45:52 +0200
Thank you Ken!
That makes a LOT more sense.. After I sent the mail I had worked out
that a single (standalone) rule worked.. But I didn't make the final
leap to realise I could then have multiple rules in the same [realms]
block.
That's solved my immediate problem, many, many thanks :-)
Met vreiendelijk groet; Owen.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Raeburn [mailto:raeburn@xxxxxxx]
Sent: maandag 21 mei 2007 16:49
To: Owen Carter
Cc: kerberos@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: WHy is this common syntax failing?
On May 21, 2007, at 10:41, Owen Carter wrote:
[realms]
MIRABEAU.NL = {
kdc = SERV1.mirabeau.nl
admin_server = SERV1.mirabeau.nl
auth_to_local = {
RULE:[2:$1](johndoe)s/^.*$/guest/
RULE:[2:$1;$2](^.*;admin$)s/;admin$//
RULE:[2:$2](^.*;root)s/^.*$/root/
DEFAULT
}
}
When I did that, Kerberos stops working.
The documentation is wrong. You need to use something like:
[realms]
MIRABEAU.NL = {
auth_to_local = RULE:blahblahblah
auth_to_local = RULE:stuffheretoo
auth_to_local = DEFAULT
}
(as a footnote; the error message could be much, much more
specific.. I mean, it doesn't even give a line number of where the
error is found in the file, let alone a true reason WHY it believes
the format is invalid.)
Yes, that would be a good improvement too....
Ken
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@xxxxxxx
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
.
- References:
- WHy is this common syntax failing?
- From: "Owen Carter"
- Re: WHy is this common syntax failing?
- From: Ken Raeburn
- WHy is this common syntax failing?
- Prev by Date: Re: WHy is this common syntax failing?
- Next by Date: Re: mod_auth_kerb gss_accept_sec_context() failed: Cannot allocate memory
- Previous by thread: Re: WHy is this common syntax failing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
