Re: Side-effects of edns-udp-size 512
- From: Doug Barton <dougb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 16:20:30 -0700
On 05/03/10 09:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
I believe having edns-udp-size set at 512 gives us maximum
compatibility with anything out there behind a broken firewall, etc,
though we should look at removing the limit at some point in the future
when possible.
Doing this will simply perpetuate the problem, not solve it.
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
.
- Prev by Date: Re: problem with domain and sub-domain configuration
- Next by Date: Re: Side-effects of edns-udp-size 512
- Previous by thread: Re: Side-effects of edns-udp-size 512
- Next by thread: Re: Side-effects of edns-udp-size 512
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|