Re: multiple threads and volatile

Hallvard B Furuseth writes:

then the program must behave as if it did just that rather than
i = 200;

- The compiler can optimize that to i = 5;

Eh. About people not being smart enough... that was an incomplete
search & replace:-)

--
Hallvard
.

References:
- multiple threads and volatile
  - From: S James S Stapleton
- Re: multiple threads and volatile
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth
- Re: multiple threads and volatile
  - From: S James S Stapleton
- Re: multiple threads and volatile
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth

Relevant Pages

Re: Defeating the type aliasing rules
... On Jun 7, 12:50 am, Hallvard B Furuseth ... the hash function. ... the compiler is not generating the fastest possible access ...
(comp.std.c)
Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?
... Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: ... But I want to see a compiler ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?
... Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: ... Does the standard say? ... I suspect so, yes. ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: [Q] Impact of Unseen Types
... Hey, found some "incomplete" type examples on the net, they seem to back up ... The compiler (at least gcc 2.95.x) fails out if you uncomment out the line ... > abstract grammar graph for the entire system. ...
(comp.lang.cpp)
Re: Angbands future (was Re: Angband maintainer)
... Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: ... "internal XP" as now but display some fraction of that as the "actual ...
(rec.games.roguelike.angband)