comp.programming.threads

• Thread Index

---

• Re: pthread_join return status 3 - Sleeping barber problem
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• pthread_join return status 3 - Sleeping barber problem
  • From: vinitha
• Re: Lockfree or not to lockfree that's the question !
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Lockfree or not to lockfree that's the question !
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: Improving the design of a multi-threaded program
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: More lock-free mania
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• More lock-free mania
  • From: Joe Seigh
• Re: Improving the design of a multi-threaded program
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• c++, java, cobol
  • From: davidboon28
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Is accessing /dev/urandom with read() and with the same fd from multiple threads safe?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: approaches for event handling
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: waitable lock-free stack algorithm...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: waitable lock-free stack algorithm...
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: waitable lock-free stack algorithm...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: approaches for event handling
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Is accessing /dev/urandom with read() and with the same fd from multiple threads safe?
  • From: Olivier Langlois
• Re: approaches for event handling
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: approaches for event handling
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: waitable lock-free stack algorithm...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: waitable lock-free stack algorithm...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: waitable lock-free stack algorithm...
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack 2
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack 2
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack 2
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack 2
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack 2
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack 2
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: calloc interposing issue with -lpthread -ldl linked in
  • From: reachanil
• Re: Improving the design of a multi-threaded program
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: calloc interposing issue with -lpthread -ldl linked in
  • From: Paul Pluzhnikov
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack 2
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Multicore programming - is that really hard?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Can a process start threads with individual user rights?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Is accessing /dev/urandom with read() and with the same fd from multiple threads safe?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Thread safe queue in C
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Thread safe queue in C
  • From: Joe Seigh
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: who knows such a threads implementation?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Thread safe queue in C
  • From: Behzad
• Improving the design of a multi-threaded program
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Is accessing /dev/urandom with read() and with the same fd from multiple threads safe?
  • From: Olivier Langlois
• Is accessing /dev/urandom with read() and with the same fd from multiple threads safe?
  • From: Olivier Langlois
• Re: Can a process start threads with individual user rights?
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: calloc interposing issue with -lpthread -ldl linked in
  • From: Marcel Müller
• Re: Thread safe queue in C
  • From: GArlington
• calloc interposing issue with -lpthread -ldl linked in
  • From: reachanil
• Re: Can a process start threads with individual user rights?
  • From: Marcin ‘Qrczak’ Kowalczyk
• Re: Herb fought the law--Amdahl's Law, that is--and Herb won-DDJ --- Did sutter really fight?
  • From: Amal
• Re: Can a process start threads with individual user rights?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: Can a process start threads with individual user rights?
  • From: kathi_x
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: approaches for event handling
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: approaches for event handling
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Thread safe queue in C
  • From: Behzad
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Lock-Free Skip List
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Lock-Free Skip List
  • From: malachy . moses
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: who knows such a threads implementation?
  • From: llothar
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Can a process start threads with individual user rights?
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: Herb fought the law--Amdahl's Law, that is--and Herb won-DDJ --- Did sutter really fight?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Can a process start threads with individual user rights?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Can a process start threads with individual user rights?
  • From: kathi_x
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: who knows such a threads implementation?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Multicore programming - is that really hard?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Lock-Free Algos
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: order of pthread_mutex_unlock()/pthread_cond_signal()
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: error handling completion
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: Herb fought the law--Amdahl's Law, that is--and Herb won-DDJ --- Did sutter really fight?
  • From: hsutter
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: Herb fought the law--Amdahl's Law, that is--and Herb won-DDJ --- Did sutter really fight?
  • From: Joe Seigh
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Multicore programming - is that really hard?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Herb fought the law--Amdahl's Law, that is--and Herb won-DDJ --- Did sutter really fight?
  • From: Amal
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: Multicore programming - is that really hard?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: Multicore programming - is that really hard?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: ti_chris
• Do I ever need to do a sched_yield() for pthread_cond_signal(..) to work?
  • From: Nelson Castillo
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: who knows such a threads implementation?
  • From: Peter Wang
• who knows such a threads implementation?
  • From: Peter Wang
• Re: lock-free Binary tree
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• lock-free Binary tree
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Nagrik
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Finding A Safe Dating Site
  • From: astping
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: Lock-Free Algos
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Lock-Free Algos
  • From: Joe Seigh
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Lock-Free Algos
  • From: ti_chris
• C# keyboard shortcut
  • From: asd
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• FIFO lockfree queue
  • From: darekm
• Re: Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Scalable distributed reference counting
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: Chetan
• Re: question on pthread condition variable
  • From: Limin Fu
• Re: question on pthread condition variable
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: malc
• Re: question on pthread condition variable
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: Joe Seigh
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: Michael Kerrisk
• Re: question on pthread condition variable
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: question on pthread condition variable
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: question on pthread condition variable
  • From: Limin Fu
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: question on pthread condition variable
  • From: Limin Fu
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: Martin Vuille
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: ppi
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: Chetan
• Re: question on pthread condition variable
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: question on pthread condition variable
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: David Schwartz
• question on pthread condition variable
  • From: Limin Fu
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: Chetan
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: Chetan
• Re: Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Thread ID in NPTL
  • From: Chetan
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Thread synchronization in stringstream (locale) - what to do?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Thread synchronization in stringstream (locale) - what to do?
  • From: Torsten Robitzki
• Thread synchronization in stringstream (locale) - what to do?
  • From: sundman . anders
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Dave Butenhof
• Re: Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free allocator
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free allocator
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: SJBartnikowski@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Hallvard B Furuseth
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free allocator
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Gerhard Menzl
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• PhD Positions in Parallel Programming and Interprocess Synchronization of Multicore Systems
  • From: danced
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: George Peter Staplin
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Alexander Terekhov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• 100% Portable Atomic Reference Counted Pointer...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Alexander Shuvaev
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: An AppCore Bug-Fix Is Ready...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: alex . shuvaev
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: An AppCore Bug-Fix Is Ready...
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: An AppCore Bug-Fix Is Ready...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: An AppCore Bug-Fix Is Ready...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Simple SPSC Queue
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: An AppCore Bug-Fix Is Ready...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: asymmetric_rw_mutex version 2
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: SJBartnikowski@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: Keith
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: alex . shuvaev
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Lock hierarchy
  • From: Hallvard B Furuseth
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: Martin Vuille
• First stab at SMR HazardPointer
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: Torsten Robitzki
• Re: asymmetric_rw_mutex version 2
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Linux pthreads real-time priority
  • From: asm198
• Re: Objects and recursive locking
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Objects and recursive locking
  • From: SJBartnikowski@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Linux pthreads real-time priority
  • From: Steve Watt
• Re: asymmetric_rw_mutex version 2
  • From: Steve Watt
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Linux pthreads real-time priority
  • From: asm198
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• DDJ archive
  • From: keith
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Greg Herlihy
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: hyc
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: SMR: Hazard Region
  • From: Joe Seigh
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Markus Elfring
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: appcore bug-fix...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: SMR: Hazard Region
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: SMR: Hazard Region
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Logan Shaw
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: hyc
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: hyc
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Chris Friesen
• Re: asymmetric_rw_mutex version 2
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: SMR: Hazard Region
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: SMR: Hazard Region
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: appcore bug-fix...
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: creating thread in C++
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Logan Shaw
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Arnold Hendriks
• Re: Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Newbie question: accessing global variable on multiprocessor
  • From: Boris
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• [Commercial] Training on Linux Kernel Programming from Industry Professionals
  • From: Concepts Systems
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Zeljko Vrba
• Re: mfence vs atomic ops
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: atomic-free spsc-lifo-stack
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Proxy-collector with atomic-free fast-path
  • From: Dmitriy V'jukov
• Re: Hierarhical locking
  • From: Dmitriy Vyukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Hierarhical locking
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: Lockfree or not to lockfree that's the question !
  • From: Dmitriy Vyukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: An AppCore Bug-Fix Is Ready...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Lockfree or not to lockfree that's the question !
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Zeljko Vrba
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• ATTN: An AppCore Bug-Fix Is Ready...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy Vyukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Alternatives to reference counting?
  • From: Dmitriy Vyukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Arnold Hendriks
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Lock hierarchy
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Lock hierarchy
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: appcore bug-fix...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: appcore bug-fix...
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: My first Proxy Collector /w a stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Re: Will there be memory leak?
  • From: Steve Watt
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: David Schwartz
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy Vyukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy Vyukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy Vyukov
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Szabolcs Ferenczi
• Re: Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Dmitriy Vyukov
• Do we need better cpu features?
  • From: Fubar
• Re: My first Proxy Collector /w a stack
  • From: Dmitriy Vyukov
• Re: appcore bug-fix...
  • From: ti_chris
• Re: My first Proxy Collector /w a stack
  • From: Chris Thomasson
• Call for Papers: The 2008 International Conference on Communications in Computing (CIC'08), USA, July 2008
  • From: A. M. G. Solo

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(17)