Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- From: Joe Seigh <jseigh_01@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:57:33 -0400
Maxim Yegorushkin wrote:
Could you give a real-world example where that low latency signal
processing would be beneficail?
Asynchronous i/o. Real time. The latter tends to depend heavily
on signals for some reason. Real time apps partly converted to
threads could be problematic especially on the newer multi-core
embedded processors.
--
Joe Seigh
When you get lemons, you make lemonade.
When you get hardware, you make software.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- From: Maxim Yegorushkin
- Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- References:
- Has pthreads become antiquated?
- From: Joe Seigh
- Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- From: Maxim Yegorushkin
- Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- From: Joe Seigh
- Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- From: Maxim Yegorushkin
- Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- From: Joe Seigh
- Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- From: Maxim Yegorushkin
- Has pthreads become antiquated?
- Prev by Date: using pthreads with fork() in linux
- Next by Date: Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- Previous by thread: Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- Next by thread: Re: Has pthreads become antiquated?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|