Re: U160 or U320 SCSI for laptop?



"Jeff Jonas" <jeffj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:fadf76$19d$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have an lto-3 tapedrive with U320 interface. I think I can connect
it to both U160 and U320. But I need to connect it to a laptop as well.
Do any options exist to interface these types of SCSI to laptops?

That's just the tip of the iceberg.

What is.

There are/were cardbus/PCMCIA SCSI host-adapters,
and there's a Xircom USB to SCSI adapter (only i-mac is supported).

But what tape format are you using

Ahh, you think he lied when he said LTO-3.

and what software are you using to achieve that?
I suspect "older" backup programs either worked directly to the
hardware, or depended on a software layer such as Adaptec's ASPI.
All that needs to be recreated.

I cut the Gordian Knot by using Linux for the tape drive
and then file transfer the files via the network.

You best option would be a desktop with a U160 or U320 PCI SCSI con-
troller and a NIC and a NIC for the laptop (builtin or PCMCIA/CardBus).
And either a EtherNet switch or a crossover EtherNet 10/100BaseT cable.

But that means the desktop needs to provide the tape software
which probably does NOT work directly thru the network.
The files will need to be transferred separately
(that's easier if the laptop's disk can be mapped to a drive letter
AND the tape software handles network-mapped drives).

Even Unix/Linux dances around that by remote-executing the tape command
(tar, cpio) on the node with the tape drive and piping the result via the net-
work to the desired node. Only RFS gave true remote access to devices via the
network since it was stateful and tunnelled the ioctl commands via the network.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: U160 or U320 SCSI for laptop?
    ... But I need to connect it to a laptop as ... Do any options exist to interface these types of SCSI to ... I cut the Gordian Knot by using Linux for the tape drive ... which probably does NOT work directly thru the network. ...
    (comp.periphs.scsi)
  • Re: One Users My Documents no longer redirected.
    ... even connect to the network at all because it's a PITA. ... So I would think that a wireless 54 mbps connection would be ... one laptop, and try it for a day or two to see what happens. ... active directory OU as the other users whose redirection works? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Problem with XP Pro and Home in same Network
    ... the network can be accessed successfully from within My Network Places. ... the laptop is the mb, the laptop can access the network from within My ... Network Places, but the desktops cannot. ... wireless computer never be a server, and certainly not a browser. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • RE: The VA Stolen Laptop - Lessons Learned
    ... disabled reaches the laptop? ... make a lot more sense when data is housed on the "work" network and NTFS ... Encrypt it with whatever you like... ... the machine or the user couldn't get to their profile off the network. ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • clarification sought in using XP Pro laptop for domain at work and workgroup at home
    ... I am inquiring for a friend. ... The XP Pro laptop was once configured for a two-computer workgroup. ... "WORKGROUP" as the name of its network affiliation. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)