Re: New Vuescan version

Don,

As usual, you started it. As usual you came with a personal attack accusing Robert of 1. spamming, and 2. misrepresenting himself for nefarious motives. Your most common personal attack is to accuse Viewscan users, many of whom are serious professionals, of being ignorant of or not caring about their image quality. You keep poking people like this and when you get an angry response you claim innocence and turn to others and say "see how they attacked me!".

PS: A quick look on the web shows that Robert D. Feinman is a very well respected fine art photographer who's panoramas are praised at places like Shutterbug Magazine and digicamsoft, and who's tutorials are linked to by SilverFast's website. (and as Don well knows, a frequent contributer to this group)


Don wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 03:12:52 GMT, "Maris V. Lidaka Sr."
<nemlidaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You don't like Vuescan, others do.

No, what I don't like is spam. As others have repeatedly pointed out
this is *not* a VueScan support group. For that go to:

alt.comp.periphs.scanners.vuescan

Or ask the VueScan author to set up something on the site.

Do you really have nothing better to do
than to post a put-down of Vuescan every time it's mentioned?

Don't shoot the messenger for merely pointing out *objective facts*
i.e. the many VueScan bugs and correcting misleading statements.

Don't start another flame war.

You should address that to the rabid VueScan "fans" hurling insults
(see parallel messages).

Indeed, I stop a flame war by ignoring them and only responding to
civilized messages even when they're blatantly wrong on all counts.

Don.
.