Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Kennedy McEwen <rkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:50:37 +0100
In article <76u4d1dqlmuerc2ec8r27lmk23q670lvko@xxxxxxx>, Don <phoney.email@xxxxxxxxx> writes
However - and as always - there's a catch and you identified it: Kodachromes! Generally, they are a nightmare to scan with Nikons. The "Kodachrome" mode (I have an LS-50 a.k.a. Coolscan V) just doesn't go far enough. When you run the A/B tests do try *dark* Kodachromes because they challenge Nikons the most!
That is simply a dynamic range issue, and applies to both scanners. -- Kennedy Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed. Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying) .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Don
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- References:
- Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Robert Gee
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: CSM1
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Robert Gee
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Don
- Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Prev by Date: Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Next by Date: Re: proper way to convert from linear gamma negatives?
- Previous by thread: Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Next by thread: Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|