Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: "CSM1" <nomoremail@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:16:03 GMT
"Robert Gee" <diapo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42D1139F.94752D66@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
>
> I plan to order a scanner to scan my K25/K64 and E6 slides.
>
> Which is best for that please. The Nikon is 600 and the Minolta 650 ?
>
It is really a matter of choice. Do you prefer a LED light source or a Cold
cathode fluorescent tube.
The Nikon uses LEDs for the light source (four, a red, a green, a blue and a
IR).
The Minolta 5400 uses Cold Cathode.
The Minolta 5400 will not scan APS film.
Nikon is a bigger name in the photography world than Minolta, If name brand
means anything to you.
Since I have had experience with a Minolta Scan Dual IV scanner (low end), I
think if it were me choosing, I would buy the Nikon. Because maybe better
tech support and a bigger photography manufacturer.
On the tech support, I have no knowledge of Nikon tech support, but I have
had experience with Minolta tech support. Minolta tech support does a bad
job of responding to email, the phone tech support is lousy also, but better
that email.
If it would help, you can look at what I have posted about the Minolta Scan
Dual IV.
http://www.carlmcmillan.com/dimagescandual_iv.htm
--
CSM1
http://www.carlmcmillan.com
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Don
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Robert Gee
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- References:
- Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Robert Gee
- Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Prev by Date: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Next by Date: Epson Perfection 3200 and 4870 scanners ocr
- Previous by thread: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Next by thread: Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
