Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Robert Gee <diapo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 18:41:32 +0200
Thank you for your answer. I'm pretty confident and i would prefer to read that
we advise me to choose the Nikon for the reason you have mentionned. But i've
read many reviews and especially the one by photozone.de that made a comparison
of coolscan vs 5400 (fluo). I know also the 5400 have been replaced by a led one
(5400 II) and about Kodachrome i have no more element to choose a one or
another. So i try to gather comments around the world to help me to decide. I
think i will also try to send samples to volunteer that can help me scanning 2
Kodachromes and one E6 on their personnal 5400/5400 II/coolscan V and send me
the digital raw files to help me to decide.
Regards
R
France.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: JJackson
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Don
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- References:
- Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: Robert Gee
- Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- From: CSM1
- Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Prev by Date: Epson Perfection 3200 and 4870 scanners ocr
- Next by Date: scanner settings for 35mm film?
- Previous by thread: Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Next by thread: Re: Minolta 5400 or Coolscan V
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|