Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
- From: retsuhcs@xxxxxxxxx (Mike S.)
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:20:06 +0000 (UTC)
We have Konica/Minolta PagePro 1250W which was purchased on the cheap when
on close-out at Staples. Beyond some annoying design defects (like a
hanging paper feed shelf which is prone to break at the hinge) it produces
very nice output at higher resolution than similar B&W lasers in this
price class.
We're now at the 4th spent toner cartridge, and my wake-up call came when
Staples didn't have the replacement in stock on the store shelf anymore.
Sure; I can order it with free shipping; but this gave me pause to think
about the wisdom of continuing to feed it.
The drum and toner are separate assemblies; so we're still on the
original drum. How many toner cartridges expected before the usage is
enough to require drum replacement? The cost of toner + drum durely
exceeds the value of the printer (heck - saw a Samsung low end laser for
$49.95 yesterday).
What would you do?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
- From: Arthur Entlich
- Re: Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
- From: Warren Block
- Re: Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
- From: LF
- Re: Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
- Prev by Date: Like the IP4500 but network ready?
- Next by Date: Re: Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
- Previous by thread: Like the IP4500 but network ready?
- Next by thread: Re: Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading