Re: Least expensive printer
- From: Richard Steinfeld <rgsteinBUTREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:06:02 -0700
Arthur Entlich wrote:
....
The reason I suggest Epson is the head is permanent, and although it may clog, it is clearable with a bit of time and under $1 in cleaning stuff yo find in your grocery store.....
I can't suggest older HP product in the color inkjet printers because the heads are part of the cartridge and can only be refilled by skilled people and the head still fails after several fill ups. New cartridges are darn costly and you won't typically find 3rd party product, as you will with Epson.
Arthur, let me be not the first to thank you. You are a superb and generous resource here, and when I get the gumption to attempt un-clogging my Epson CX4600, I'm going to review-again your cleaning procedures. I don't anticipate having much fun because of the disemboweling of the all-in-one's layers to get to the print heads.
But I've been reviewing various posts on this NG for a while, as well as gaining some experience with my own HPs, so I'd like to clarify your words a little. Here goes:
1. Each brand of inkjet seems to have its strengths and weaknesses. I don't sense that any one is "better" or "worse" than any other. I'm not certain that this is true of Lexmark, however, but not too many people have experience with this brand.
2. I need some reassurance that Epson's printers are reliable enough to invest in one, since I've heard that Epson heads are difficult to replace and that replacement heads cost a fortune.
3. I have already refilled a few HP cartridges, color and black, successfully. I'm pretty new at this, so I've gone slowly. Even with improper dye "universal" (Universal tm) ink, the black's actually been OK for my use, but I won't buy anything like this again -- I just wanted to see what would happen and it was staring me in the face in the store.
I've just done my refilling relying on my common sense and mechanical knowledge and skill.
I've decided to concentrate on HP inkjets simply because I came into four of them: three from a thrift shop for $5 each, and one as a gift. An advantage, as pointed out by Bob Headrick, a generous former HP employee, is that HP uses not only the usual pre-print costly ink-dumping to clear the nozzles, but also has some sort of proprietary print head wiping. The result is that the printer and its cartridges can sit unused for quite a long time, a number of months, in fact, and then perform flawlessly. It's been said by a few people here that Lexmark printers, which use essentially the same technology as HP, must be used once per week before the cartridges clog.
I can buy refilled HP cartridges easily because they're so common. And people here have refilled HP cartridges quite a number of times without having to replace them. I assume that this experience varies, however.
I'm going to scrap an older HP printer (an 850c) because it's got one or two damaged parts, and I have the other reliable, newer machines already. However, I actually liked this model. I believe that its ink is identical to that used in my other machines. I especially like the fact that it's a little slower, and I appreciate slowness in machinery, since it's less likely to rip itself apart.
Richard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Least expensive printer
- From: Arthur Entlich
- Re: Least expensive printer
- From: Bob Headrick
- Re: Least expensive printer
- References:
- Least expensive printer
- From: Sudy Nim
- Re: Least expensive printer
- From: Arthur Entlich
- Least expensive printer
- Prev by Date: Re: Laser vs. Ink
- Next by Date: Re: Laser vs. Ink
- Previous by thread: Re: Least expensive printer
- Next by thread: Re: Least expensive printer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading