Re: no such thing as a "generic" printer...


"William R. Walsh" <newsgroups1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message news:mY4fg.998031$xm3.164960@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi!

I see that our resident troll and oem spammer is trying to convince
someone (himself?) that there is such a thing as a "generic' printer.

A generic printer?

While there's probably no printer that is named or sold as such, almost
any
printer with an onboard processor can be driven with a generic driver that
allows text-only printing.

I don't know if any modern printers still emulate Epson (FX-80) or IBM
Graphics printers, but those are also drivers that can treat a printer as
though it were a "generic" type.

William



Unfortunately, what we have to contend with here is a generic troll. When
he doesn't like the message he attacks the messenger. Anyone who reports
good results with aftermarket inks (NOT generic, but formulated for each
printer) is attacked as an "agent" for the aftermarket ink industry. No
one can figure out what motivates him to continue to misinform. My take on
the subject is that he simply enjoys being a *** disturber and annoying
people. It only took mr. "Stanford MBA" a year or so to realize that his
all caps, misspelled, baby-talk, sometimes-obscene posts lack credibility
regardless of their content. Or --- has his more civil but equally biased
twin brother taken over his misinformation mission.


.

Quantcast