Re: cheap postscript laser?
- From: "Paul Walker" <gnewsremove1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Jan 2006 16:01:40 -0800
I think the key point is to consider what would be the alternative. If
each manufacturer had it's own interface language, then driver
development would be much more difficult, and would require significant
coordination between the printer manufacturer and whoever writes the
driver (which needs to be integrated with the OS). A standard language
gives the OS vendor and the printer manufacturer a reference point. PS
fills this niche quite well (I suspect that some would argue that PCL
also does this job well).
In a world with N printer manufacturers, and M OS vendors, a common
language means you only need M+N solutions, instead of M*N solutions.
Back in the "old days", I wrote a graphics driver for an Anadex DP9501
printer. If I wanted to change to a different printer, I would have
needed another manual (to describe the different set of escape codes,
resolution, graphic data formatting, etc.), and I might even have to
re-architect the driver (e.g. does the printer use polar coordiantes
instead of cartesian, or is it vector vs. bit-mapped, or ???). By
contrast, PS can describe a complex image in a device independent
manner.
The "flies in the ointment" with PS are that different printer features
(like tray source selection, duplex, etc.) can require specialized
code. However, this is a small item, compared to the general case of
describing a page. Of course, these issues must be solved for any
solution.
Hope this helped,
Paul
BTW - No aspersions were received :-)
Bill Martin wrote:
> Paul Walker wrote:
> > Besides PS or PCL, what standard PDL would you recommend? It
> > should be platform independent, OS independent, and well documented.
> >
> > Paul
> ----------
>
> I have no recommendation. Platform independence I presume you mean so that you
> can print the document to file on one platform and ship the file to another
> platform to print out? In the rare occasions I'd want to do that I'd probably
> just print to a PDF file.
>
> Note that I'm not casting aspersions on anyone's choices. Just curious what
> motivates choices for people with different computing problems than I have.
>
> Bill
.
- References:
- cheap postscript laser?
- From: b . stolk
- Re: cheap postscript laser?
- From: Bill Martin
- Re: cheap postscript laser?
- From: Paul Walker
- Re: cheap postscript laser?
- From: Bill Martin
- cheap postscript laser?
- Prev by Date: Re: Brother HL-1440 streaks
- Next by Date: Re: Brother HL-1440 streaks
- Previous by thread: Re: cheap postscript laser?
- Next by thread: Canon i70 prints only colors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|