Re: THE TRUTH
- From: Tony <TonytheTigurrrrr@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 03:46:39 -0000
measekite <inkystinky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Tony wrote:
>
>>measekite <inkystinky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>>>>I KNOW YOU WILL NOT FIND ANYTHING BECAUSE I JUST SCOURED THE SITE.
>>>>>
>>>>Definition of scour
>>>>
>>>>"To have diarrhoea. Used of livestock."
>>>>
>>>>(Courtesy of of one of the online dictionaries.)
>>>>
>>>>Seems appropriate to me, I expect you did exactly that.
>>>>
>>>>(another big snip of drivel)
>>>>
>>>>Tony
>>>>
>>>BUSINESS BAD NOW?????
>>>
>>Thanks for asking; actually it has gone from good to very good ever since you
>>started to give OEM ink a bad name by your inept and transparent undercover
>>spamming for Canon.
>>Keep up the good work!
>>Tony
>>
>GOTTA HAND IT TO YA. YOU HAVE BAMBOOZLED THE MORONS. IDIOTS, LIARS, AND
>MANY OTHER INCOMPETENTS ON THIS NG.
(silly stuff snipped)
Once again you are right I have done exactly that to all the morons, idiots,
liars and incompetents here.....the problem is there is only one of them and
that is you! And it's no sport really 'cos you are too easy to bamboozle.
None of the other readers and contributors are fooled in any way at all, they
know exactly what is kosher here and what is not.
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: THE TRUTH
- From: measekite
- Re: THE TRUTH
- References:
- Re: THE TRUTH
- From: measekite
- Re: THE TRUTH
- From: zakezuke
- Re: THE TRUTH
- From: zakezuke
- Re: THE TRUTH
- From: measekite
- Re: THE TRUTH
- Prev by Date: Re: Test's on 3rd Party Inks
- Next by Date: Re: "Best" personal laser printer? I duplex useful or gimmick?
- Previous by thread: Re: THE TRUTH
- Next by thread: Re: THE TRUTH
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading