Re: [9fans] 9ttp
- From: dexen.devries@xxxxxxxxx (dexen deVries)
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:06:07 GMT
On Thursday 08 of September 2011 14:54:40 erik quanstrom wrote:
On Thu Sep 8 04:52:08 EDT 2011, 23hiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
HTTP is technically different and not easily comparable to 9p. HTTP is
not a good example of how to do things, but over high-latency links 9p
with a single outstanding request
is much slower for getting files.
there, fixed that for ya.
is 9p windowable at all? is that implemented?
--
dexen deVries
[[[↓][→]]]
For example, if the first thing in the file is:
<?kzy irefvba="1.0" rapbqvat="ebg13"?>
an XML parser will recognize that the document is stored in the traditional
ROT13 encoding.
(( Joe English, http://www.flightlab.com/~joe/sgml/faq-not.txt ))
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [9fans] 9ttp
- From: David Leimbach
- Re: [9fans] 9ttp
- References:
- [9fans] 9ttp
- From: s s
- [9fans] 9ttp
- Prev by Date: Re: [9fans] 9ttp
- Next by Date: Re: [9fans] Intel atom system
- Previous by thread: Re: [9fans] 9ttp
- Next by thread: Re: [9fans] 9ttp
- Index(es):