Re: [9fans] parallel systems

The issue here is that all the things you are saying can be (and have
been) measured. They can be quantified. There are variations in just
how much parallelism is possible depending on the application or even
the type of application.

This type of discussion, absent some sort of quantification, belongs
more in the Pointy Headed Boss domain than this mailling list. It's
akin to arguing about power without knowing what terms like volts and
amps mean.

In other words, the discussion to date has had zero semantic content.

ron

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
    ... Inside the scope of quantification, ... and you seem to be saying exactly the same ... The distinction between truth and provability, ... ridiculous howling error, but it is not the particular tremendously ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
    ... > |> By saying that we can never completely quantify Reality, is to admit ... > limitation and attributes and c is as a stepping stone in our quantification ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Alan Turings Halting Problem is incorrectly formed
    ... > which involves quantification over sentences (or propositions). ... >Are you saying this is not possible also then? ... Daryl McCullough ...
    (sci.logic)