Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- From: akumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Akshat Kumar)
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:27:04 GMT
this sounds like a bug in usb/disk. usb/disk should be
able to handle a sleeping drive without passing i/o
errors up.
That's probably a USB issue, yes. However, now, I've
setup my drive not to go into sleep mode at all, but
I see the following from earlier today:
....
89806 blocks queued for worm
0 falsehits
next dump at ...
next dump at ...
wrenread: error on w0(1691022): %r
89805 blocks copied to worm
where w0 is the disk itself. Note that the final message
states 89805 blocks were copied, whereas initially
89806 blocks were queued - was the error on just this one
block? If so, what could possibly be the reason? I doubt
my USB drive would be acting up.
Thanks,
ak
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- From: erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- References:
- Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- From: erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- Prev by Date: Re: [9fans] Getting printing to work over ethernet
- Next by Date: Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- Previous by thread: Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- Next by thread: Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|