Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- From: akumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Akshat Kumar)
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:43:30 GMT
I believe there may be an inconsistency somewhere
in the dump records themselves. When I tried to
copy back the file from the dump, into the active
fs, after a while of copying, cwfs panicked with:
main grow ...
tag = 5/23; expected 757/7 -- not flushed
panic: cwio: checktag c bucket
halted ...
So I ran a `check' after starting up cwfs again, but
nbad = 0
nqbad = 0
although
nmiss = 224455
and still I don't know whether the nmiss is something
that ought to be fixed, or how.
Anyways, the check doesn't seem to reveal any
tag inconsistencies - any suggestions for further tests
in revealing what might be the issue? Or possible
fixes?
Thanks,
ak
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- From: cinap_lenrek
- Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- References:
- Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- From: Akshat Kumar
- Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- Prev by Date: Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- Next by Date: Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- Previous by thread: Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- Next by thread: Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
- Index(es):