Re: [9fans] VIA VT8237 SATA/RAID i/o errors, dma doesnt work

block sizes dont seem to matter, tried from 512 bytes to 64K in the
adaptec case. i also get no errors in /dev/kprint. just read() returns
Eio.

i have no knowledge of IDE or SATA interfaces, so i'm a little bit lost
in the code. :-( the chipset specific IDE code in linux seens to set
mostly some timing related control registers, but doesnt change
the logic how error conditions are handled as far as i can see. maybe
it does by switching some important quirk flags but its not obvious
to me.

i would like to raise the debug level of sdata.c, just set any bit and got
flooded with messages. so it would be great if you could hint me on
some interesting debug cases where to look.

many thanks so far for the quick responses! :-)

cinap
--- Begin Message ---
Now this is very interesting! A friend gave me an Adaptec (it really is an SiL) 2xSATA
PCI controller [1] for testing, and i was able to generate I/O errors just by reading from
both drives in paralel! Does anybody run multiple SATA drives in IDE-mode without
problems under Plan9?

[1] pci -v
0.20.0: disk 01.80.01 1095/3112 15 0:0000fb01 16 1:0000fa01 16 2:0000f901 16 3:0000f801 16 4:0000f701 16 5:fdffd000 512
Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3112 SATALink/SATARaid Controller

cinap

yes. i have a cpu server with an nforce-based motherboard and two sata
hard drives recognized as ide. i have never had a problem with the ide
emulation on this motherboard.

i think there is insufficient evidence to jump to the conclusion that plan 9
has trouble with >1 sata drive accessed via ide emulation. if linux uses
ide emulation with the same ata commands & transfer sizes, do you get
the same errors? (do you notice any performance funnies?)

we have a sata protcol analyzer. we've seen some mighty interesting things
with it. for instance, some hard drive firmware generates sata protocol violations
when pushed hard. and some hard drive firmware generates sata protocol
violations with very little load. generally hard drives, when they do this
send a few data FISes but forget to finish the transaction. this causes the
chipset to wait forever. this can look something like what you are seeing.
on the other hand, there are reports of via chipsets having trouble dealing
with concurrent access and we have also seen chipsets generating sata protocol
violations.

it could be that the linux driver has exactly this problem but notices
that it's hung up and has a few tricky moves to get the device unstuck.

- erik
--- End Message ---

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Reinstalling Windows
    ... because the whole area is specific to the BIOS, the chipset, the SATA ... controller IN ADDITION TO the controllers (yes, ... But since it has NO IDE at all (none of the Intel ...
    (comp.sys.laptops)
  • Re: Reinstalling Windows
    ... distinct controllers) within the chipset). ... But since it has NO IDE at all, MOST motherboards have an additional controller, most commonly a JMicron part that has both still more SATA ports and an IDE port. ... With the emulation on, XP installs easily, but the emulation is inferior to using the SATA drives as SATA drives. ...
    (comp.sys.laptops)
  • Re: SATA/IDE Dual Mode w/Intel 945 Chipset or HOW TO LIQUIFY a flash IDE chip under 2.6.18
    ... SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18. ... I note that the 945 chipset in the shuttle PC had some serious ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: SATA/IDE Dual Mode w/Intel 945 Chipset or HOW TO LIQUIFY a flash IDE chip under 2.6.18
    ... Shuttle motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support ... SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Sata or IDE opinions sought
    ... As an old computer jock since early DOS days I tend to think IDE, ... clear advantage to using the SATA over the IDE please? ... did an observational experiment on 2 SATA hard drives. ... NTFS partition is a logical, and identical and visible on both hard drives. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)