Re: [9fans] slow performance
- From: quanstro@xxxxxxxxxx (erik quanstrom)
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 01:41:59 GMT
On Sat Mar 31 19:35:39 EDT 2007, ph.rpguo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
So, plan 9 wasnt made for, hmm, heavy computing tasks, like 2 milions of
calls of recursive functions
working with some complex data structure (not my data structure, hehe), or
something like that?
rather, when there was a conflict between squeezing every last cycle
out of the machine or simplicity, the designers of plan 9 generally
opted for simplicity. when there was a conflict between generality
and performance, the bias was toward generality.
the beauty of plan 9 is sum of these well-thought-out choices.
as you point out, these choices are always worth revisiting.
they seem to be working well for the time being.
btw, plan 9 is perfectly well-suited to your examples.
- erik
.
- Prev by Date: Re: [9fans] slow performance
- Next by Date: [9fans] rc funny
- Previous by thread: Re: [9fans] slow performance
- Next by thread: Re: [9fans] slow performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|