Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
- From: quanstro@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 04:15:25 GMT
think you're right.
i am a charter member of the "shoot, ready, aim" school of email reading.
☺ erik
On Thu Jun 8 10:03:29 CDT 2006, leimy2k@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 6/7/06, quanstro@xxxxxxxxxxxx <quanstro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:.
On Wed Jun 7 20:08:54 CDT 2006, lionkov@xxxxxxxx wrote:I think you may have zoomed in on the wrong interpretation of his
We have to choose between having clean system that is used by handful
of people, or slightly dirtier one (but still better than Linux for
example) that can attract more users.
I don't think the Plan9 community has the resources (both in numbers
and quality) to continue the development. We need fresh blood.
thanks for insulting everyone here. i simply don't agree that the quality
of programmers working on plan 9 is lacking. from what i've seen it's top
shelf.
- erik
parenthesis. I took it as "there are good programmers in terms of
quality in the plan 9 community, but not enough."
Dave
- References:
- Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
- From: David Leimbach
- Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
- Prev by Date: Re: [9fans] Diskless cpu servers
- Next by Date: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
- Previous by thread: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
- Next by thread: [9fans] quantity vs. quality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|