Re: AMD Based Motherboards



Hi Peter!

Peter Brown wrote:
Hi Eric

Eric Erickson wrote:
What are new AMD motherboards are folks having eCS Success with. Looking for
the following minimum characteristics.

AMD based motherboard
parallel (1P)
serial (1P)
IDE (1CH)
floppy controllers
SATA minimum 2 channels

SMP Capable is a nice to have.

TIA


Eric Erickson
Elvish Software Foundry, Inc. - Internet: drowelf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Already where I want to be Today - Voice/Fax: (218)-398-2625




"SMP Capable" is probably all that are on offer - all mainboards I've looked at come with single or multi core cpu support.

If you plan on using multicore CPUs then I suggest you look at other mainboards as ACPI support - required for SMP - is currently a bit lacking for AMD chipsets.

If "AMD based motherboard" simply means to use AMD CPUs rather than specifying the chipset then I have had a fair amount of success with mainbards based on nVidia nForce4/430 chipsets and AMD64 x2 CPUs so would suggest a mainbard based on nVidia chipsets. If you want a brand my 1st choice would be Asus http://uk.asus.com/ - select appropriate Area/Country.

Regards

Pete

What is a working choice still available for Intel with up to G45 chipset level which is still covered in the SNAP 318 code .. or AMD CPU's as you note? Folks around me are looking for:

parallel (1P)
serial (2P)
IDE (1CH)
floppy controllers - preferably A and B both (2 drives).
SATA minimum 2 channels
At least two PCI slots - preferably three

I'd really like to stay with Intel but AMD is sure there. Further, I'd really like to know what folks have now which is working with MCP2 latest level stuff. Which is really as I think of focus for the finalization work for eCs now.

The Intel 915GAVL and GEVL stuff works fine now but isn't produced. I've not been able to research the Intel 945 stuff at all and it is months back already. I've currently gotten a Modular Industrial Solutions SMB-9455 industrial board totally working with their 7062 passive backplane for at least two PCI slots on the backplane. I have it working with:

Intel P4 CPU level.
Intel 945 video complete on SNAP 318
Intel Pro100/1000 NIC chip with Genmac in undocumented mode.
SBlive 5.1 level daughter board audio with the olde 1.0.9+ Uniaud.
Full four plus port serial operation with their daughterboard 3/4 added.
1 parallel port.
1 IDE latest level everything.
SATA drive support.
Fully functional with Adaptec 2940U2W(pro) or 29160 service in PCI slot.
A second Kingston KT120 PCI slot NIC for LAN1 non-forwarded network use.

That with a new Tri-Mag Industrial case with EMP pulse certifiable
protection.

The last glitch still unresolved is that the Phoenix BIOS for the SMB-9455 industrial board will not allow disablement of the VGA video in DOS-VDM use to expand the lower DOS 640K of memory with GGA or MONO video settings.

I've given substantial research data to MIS as well as Veit the author of the 2KSTACK patch release for the Phoenix BIOS for the IBM ThinkPads which cured this. But to date have I no response from Veit or a patch fix from Phoenix for this yet.

This for ongoing 100,000 MTBF server work for us with OS/2. But I have no easy forward buy and try workstation motherboard information yet.

Regardless of where eCs and whatever are headed, it is absolutely critical that anyone who wants to move OS/2 forward, for new .. or protective use, whatever, be able to put a server and a brand new 10-16 unit workstation operation into fully functional hardware 100,000 hour server supported time frame operations in not more than a couple days time. Then move strongly into whatever it takes to train the 20-50 people or more that will use it in the shortest possible time to fruition.

From hardware that has to be supported with a current production run for a really reasonable time frame of availability!

In my opinion! Which I am trying to support, GDRFC!


Suggestions?


--


--> Sleep well; OS2's still awake! ;)

Mike Luther
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: AMD sues Intel (antitrust)
    ... > nobody any good in terms of reviving interest in the industry. ... The chipsets themselves aren't, but the features they bring can be. ... You're not going to get a gamer's laptop out of Intel ... AMD is just more of the same. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)
  • Re: AMD vs Intel - Ghz & performance question
    ... If it weren't for trying to stay ahead of the competition, Intel ... >> performance when going to SLI with AMD systems. ... comparing Nvidia's own Nforce chipsets against ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)
  • Re: SCSI vs S-ATA
    ... >> when I finally decided that AMD needed full control of the ... >> motherboard chipsets to build a reliable box. ... >> IV bottles hanging over my head, Intel on one and MS on the other. ... > I have some servers built around Athlon MP processors that work just ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: What motherboards are based on Intel 915 and Intel 945 chipsets
    ... neither the resources nor the time to try out various motherboards to ... area is go to with Intel then I think that is the one I should go for. ... never experienced a problem directly I'm heard of problems involving AMD ... Since there's 5/6 different "AMD chipsets" the only conclusion I have is ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)
  • Re: intel 64 bit instructions vs amd 64 bit instructions
    ... AMD has 40 bits physical and Intel has 36bit physical right now. ... They both have 48bits virtual address space support. ... Intel supports compat mode and 64bit mode SYSENTER and 64bit SYSCALL, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)