Re: NETBIOS NAMES= numbers
- From: Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 04:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
[A complimentary Cc of this posting was NOT [per weedlist] sent to
Bob Eager
<rde42@xxxxxxxxxxx>], who wrote in article <176uZD2KcidF-pn2-1uGMW7FN6Xi6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Now I'm fully confused... In the previous message it was said that
> > the LANTRAN.LOG numbers are for
> >
> > The numbers in PROTOCOL.INI minus the ones in IBMLAN.INI minus the
> > odd one or two.
> >
> > And "what is left" is after
> >
> > "AFNB.SYS ... subtracts resources from this"
> >
> > Which of the descriptions is correct?
>
> AFNB.SYS takes what it needs from the number left that is stated in
> LANTRAN.LOG.
.... And my question was: how to find out what remains after AFNB.SYS
takes what it needs.
> You probably don't even *need* AFNB.SYS...
Quite probable. Would ICAT work without it (remotely)? What about DB2?
Thanks,
Ilya
.
- References:
- TCPBEUI misbehaving
- From: Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: NETBIOS NAMES= numbers
- From: Bob Eager
- Re: NETBIOS NAMES= numbers
- From: Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: NETBIOS NAMES= numbers
- From: Bob Eager
- TCPBEUI misbehaving
- Prev by Date: Re: NETBIOS NAMES= numbers
- Next by Date: Re: NETBIOS NAMES= numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: NETBIOS NAMES= numbers
- Next by thread: Re: NETBIOS NAMES= numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|