Re: More about: "Java REGISTRY missing or incorrect?"
- From: "Stan Goodman" <SPAM_FOILER@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2007 08:15:25 GMT
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:59:45 UTC, Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@xxxxxxxx>
opined:
Stan Goodman schrieb:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:06:43 UTC, Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@xxxxxxxx>
opined:
I don't have the faintest idea. The only thing I did is have a look atDoes it want me to edit the registry in some way? Or delete theMaybe try:
existing directory? Or do something else?
SET J2NOVERIFYREGISTRY=1 (or =T or =TRUE)
in config.sys
Lars
Oh, that's GOOD. Very easy, and it worked. Is there a downside for
ignoring the Registry?
J2WIN.DLL with a text editor and finding that string. From the name I
deduced that the registry would somehow be ignored.
The funny thing is: here, I also don't have anything Java related in the
registry (neither in the OS/2 registry nor in the "Windows mimicked"
registry) and I also do not have that setting in config.sys and still I
don't get the error message that you get.
Lars
What I have is an empty folder. I have these folder (among others):
HKEY_USERS
SOFTWARE
J2WIN
No, I don't have that.
All the folders in the entire HKEY_USERS hierarchy contain nothing but
(DEFAULT) (Value not set). Do you have that J2WIN folder? If not,
perhaps that is the key; I wonder if in its absence I would need the
line in CONFIG.SYS.
You rather mean: in its presence it needs the line in config.sys in
order to be ignored.
What I said is correct. What you said is also correct. The difference
is the doughnut vs the hole.
The bottom line is that there was no problem with Java (as the error
message implied), or even any corruption of the Registry, but only a
quirk, for which there were at least two easy workarounds.
--
Stan Goodman
Qiryat Tiv'on
Israel
.
- References:
- More about: "Java REGISTRY missing or incorrect?"
- From: Stan Goodman
- Re: More about: "Java REGISTRY missing or incorrect?"
- From: Lars Erdmann
- Re: More about: "Java REGISTRY missing or incorrect?"
- From: Stan Goodman
- Re: More about: "Java REGISTRY missing or incorrect?"
- From: Lars Erdmann
- Re: More about: "Java REGISTRY missing or incorrect?"
- From: Stan Goodman
- Re: More about: "Java REGISTRY missing or incorrect?"
- From: Lars Erdmann
- More about: "Java REGISTRY missing or incorrect?"
- Prev by Date: Re: LPD/LPR printing or alternative
- Next by Date: Re: LPD/LPR printing or alternative
- Previous by thread: Re: More about: "Java REGISTRY missing or incorrect?"
- Next by thread: LPD/LPR printing or alternative
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|