Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- From: Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:55:56 +0000 (UTC)
[A complimentary Cc of this posting was sent to
James J. Weinkam
<jjw@xxxxxxxxx>], who wrote in article <nw1Ki.10293$nO3.10050@edtnps90>:
Peter Brown wrote:
Tip: Burners seem to prefer to be Master with ROMs as Slave rather than
the reverse.
At least with IDE burners, my experience with at least six different
models has been that the burner must be master and there must be no
other activity on the same IDE controller while burning is going on.
I see absolutely no problem with burning to a slave IDE burner sitting
on the same IDE channel as the HD with files I burn in.
Just do not forget to give something like --buffer-check 60 to dvddao.
Hope this helps,
Ilya
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- From: Mike Luther
- Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- References:
- Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- From: Mike Luther
- Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- From: Mike Luther
- Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- From: Peter Brown
- Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- From: James J. Weinkam
- Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- Prev by Date: Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- Next by Date: Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- Previous by thread: Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- Next by thread: Re: Strange PEER error with Dani's 506 1.81 generic question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
