Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453989
- From: Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:11:24 +0200
tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote in <4KTMg.4473$%i.1618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
[10698] Classic (5368) unsubstantiated (4743) and erroneous (5794)
[10698] claim.
Ironic.
[10699] Classic (5369) unsubstantiated (4744) and erroneous (5795)
[10699] claim.
Ironic.
[10700] On your part, Sandman.
Illogical.
[10701] On your part, Sandman.
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10702] Classic (5370) erroneous (5796) presupposition of
[10702] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10703] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10703] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Non sequitur.
[10704] Classic (5371) unsubstantiated (4745) and erroneous (5797)
[10704] claim.
Incorrect.
[10705] Where is the alleged (1326) irony, Sandman?
Incorrect.
[10706] Classic (5372) unsubstantiated (4746) and erroneous (5798)
[10706] claim.
Incorrect.
[10707] Classic (5373) unsubstantiated (4747) and erroneous (5799)
[10707] claim.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
[10708] Classic (5374) unsubstantiated (4748) and erroneous (5800)
[10708] claim.
Illogical.
[10709] Classic (5375) unsubstantiated (4749) and erroneous (5801)
[10709] claim.
Illogical.
[10710] Classic (5376) unsubstantiated (4750) and erroneous (5802)
[10710] claim.
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10711] On your part, Sandman.
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10712] On your part, Sandman.
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10713] Classic (5377) unsubstantiated (4751) and erroneous (5803)
[10713] claim.
Illogical.
[10714] You should know, Sandman, given that (1287) you keep
[10714] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Non sequitur.
[10715] Classic (5378) unsubstantiated (4752) and erroneous (5804)
[10715] claim.
Ironic.
[10716] Classic (5379) erroneous (5805) presupposition of
[10716] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10717] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10717] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Ironic.
[10718] Classic (5380) unsubstantiated (4753) and erroneous (5806)
[10718] claim.
Incorrect.
[10719] Where is the alleged (1327) irony, Sandman?
Ironic.
[10720] Classic (5381) unsubstantiated (4754) and erroneous (5807)
[10720] claim.
Ironic.
[10721] You should know, Sandman, given that (1288) you keep
[10721] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Ironic.
[10722] Where is the alleged (1328) irony, Sandman?
Ironic.
[10723] Classic (5382) unsubstantiated (4755) and erroneous (5808)
[10723] claim.
Illogical.
[10724] Classic (5383) unsubstantiated (4756) and erroneous (5809)
[10724] claim.
Incorrect.
[10725] Classic (5384) unsubstantiated (4757) and erroneous (5810)
[10725] claim.
Incorrect.
[10726] Classic (5385) unsubstantiated (4758) and erroneous (5811)
[10726] claim.
Ironic.
[10727] Classic (5386) erroneous (5812) presupposition of
[10727] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10728] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10728] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Incorrect.
[10729] On your part, Sandman.
Illogical.
[10730] Classic (5387) unsubstantiated (4759) and erroneous (5813)
[10730] claim.
Non sequitur.
[10731] You should know, Sandman, given that (1289) you keep
[10731] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Incorrect.
[10732] You should know, Sandman, given that (1290) you keep
[10732] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Illogical.
[10733] Classic (5388) unsubstantiated (4760) and erroneous (5814)
[10733] claim.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
[10734] On your part, Sandman.
Incorrect.
[10735] Classic (5389) unsubstantiated (4761) and erroneous (5815)
[10735] claim.
Incorrect.
[10736] Classic (5390) unsubstantiated (4762) and erroneous (5816)
[10736] claim.
Ironic.
[10737] You should know, Sandman, given that (1291) you keep
[10737] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Incorrect.
[10738] Where is the alleged (1329) irony, Sandman?
Non sequitur.
[10739] Classic (5391) unsubstantiated (4763) and erroneous (5817)
[10739] claim.
Non sequitur.
[10740] Classic (5392) erroneous (5818) presupposition of
[10740] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10741] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10741] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Incorrect.
[10742] You should know, Sandman, given that (1292) you keep
[10742] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Incorrect.
[10743] You should know, Sandman, given that (1293) you keep
[10743] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10744] Classic (5393) unsubstantiated (4764) and erroneous (5819)
[10744] claim.
Non sequitur.
[10745] You should know, Sandman, given that (1294) you keep
[10745] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Ironic.
[10746] Classic (5394) unsubstantiated (4765) and erroneous (5820)
[10746] claim.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
[10747] Classic (5395) erroneous (5821) presupposition of
[10747] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10748] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10748] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Non sequitur.
[10749] Classic (5396) unsubstantiated (4766) and erroneous (5822)
[10749] claim.
Illogical.
[10750] Classic (5397) unsubstantiated (4767) and erroneous (5823)
[10750] claim.
Ironic.
[10751] Classic (5398) unsubstantiated (4768) and erroneous (5824)
[10751] claim.
Illogical.
[10752] You should know, Sandman, given that (1295) you keep
[10752] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Incorrect.
[10753] Where is the alleged (1330) irony, Sandman?
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
[10754] Classic (5399) unsubstantiated (4769) and erroneous (5825)
[10754] claim.
Incorrect.
[10755] Classic (5400) erroneous (5826) presupposition of
[10755] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10756] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10756] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Illogical.
[10757] Classic (5401) unsubstantiated (4770) and erroneous (5827)
[10757] claim.
Ironic.
[10758] Classic (5402) unsubstantiated (4771) and erroneous (5828)
[10758] claim.
Illogical.
[10759] Classic (5403) unsubstantiated (4772) and erroneous (5829)
[10759] claim.
Incorrect.
[10760] Classic (5404) unsubstantiated (4773) and erroneous (5830)
[10760] claim.
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10761] Classic (5405) erroneous (5831) presupposition of trolling
[10761] on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued trolling.
[10762] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been trolling,
[10762] as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
[10763] You should know, Sandman, given that (1296) you keep
[10763] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Illogical.
[10764] Classic (5406) unsubstantiated (4774) and erroneous (5832)
[10764] claim.
Incorrect.
[10765] Classic (5407) unsubstantiated (4775) and erroneous (5833)
[10765] claim.
Illogical.
[10766] You should know, Sandman, given that (1297) you keep
[10766] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Ironic.
[10767] Classic (5408) erroneous (5834) presupposition of trolling
[10767] and harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued trolling and harassment.
[10768] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been trolling
[10768] and harassing, as demonstrated by the thread you started
[10768] with:
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10769] You should know, Sandman, given that (1298) you keep
[10769] posting your harassment to an OS/2 newsgroup.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
[10770] On your part, Sandman.
Ironic.
[10771] Classic (5409) unsubstantiated (4776) and erroneous (5835)
[10771] claim.
Incorrect.
[10772] Classic (5410) erroneous (5836) presupposition of
[10772] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10773] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10773] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10774] Where is the alleged (1331) irony, Sandman?
Ironic.
[10775] Classic (5411) unsubstantiated (4777) and erroneous (5837)
[10775] claim.
Non sequitur.
[10776] Classic (5412) unsubstantiated (4778) and erroneous (5838)
[10776] claim.
Non sequitur.
[10777] Classic (5413) unsubstantiated (4779) and erroneous (5839)
[10777] claim.
Ironic.
[10778] Classic (5414) erroneous (5840) presupposition of
[10778] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10779] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10779] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Incorrect.
[10780] On your part, Sandman.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
[10781] Classic (5415) unsubstantiated (4780) and erroneous (5841)
[10781] claim.
Ironic.
[10782] Classic (5416) unsubstantiated (4781) and erroneous (5842)
[10782] claim.
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10783] What does your question have to do with OS/2 (373),
[10783] Sandman?
What does your harassment have to do with OS/2?
[10784] Classic (5417) unsubstantiated (4782) and erroneous (5843)
[10784] claim.
Illogical.
[10785] Classic (5418) erroneous (5844) presupposition of trolling
[10785] and harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued trolling and harassment.
[10786] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been trolling
[10786] and harassing, as demonstrated by the thread you started
[10786] with:
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10787] Classic (5419) unsubstantiated (4783) and erroneous (5845)
[10787] claim.
Illogical.
[10788] Classic (5420) erroneous (5846) presupposition of
[10788] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10789] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10789] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Incorrect.
[10790] Classic (5421) unsubstantiated (4784) and erroneous (5847)
[10790] claim.
Non sequitur.
[10791] Classic (5422) erroneous (5848) presupposition of
[10791] harassment on my part, Sandman.
Incorrect, given your continued harassment.
[10792] Rather ironic, coming from someone who has been harassing
[10792] me, as demonstrated by the thread you started with:
Ironic.
[10793] On your part, Sandman.
What does that have to do with OS/2?
[10794] Classic (5423) unsubstantiated (4785) and erroneous (5849)
[10794] claim.
Illogical.
[10795] Where is the alleged (1332) irony, Sandman?
Illogical.
[10796] What is a "Tholenator summary", Sandman, and what does it
[10796] have to do with OS/2 (374)?
What does your harassment have to do with OS/2?
[10797] How ironic (153), given your 400+ meaningless replies,
[10797] Sandman.
Illogical.
[10798] What does that have to do with OS/2 (375), Sandman?
What does your harassment have to do with OS/2?
[10799] I see that you still didn't bother to address most of the
[10799] issues raised in Sandman digest volume 2453980, Sandman.
Ironic.
[10800] Classic (5424) evasion.
Illogical.
[10801] Shall I restore them for you?
Incorrect.
Tholenator summary of meaningless replies:
+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| comprehension 0 7343 | illogic 0 167 |
| irrelevant 0 212 | liar 0 39 |
| pontification 0 26 | classic 57 5481 |
| how ironic 1 154 | unsubstantiated 43 4828 |
| erroneous 56 5905 | burden of proof 0 29 |
| no surprise 0 127 | given that 12 1310 |
| presupposing 0 232 | allege 7 1339 |
| basis 0 622 | unnecessary 0 65 |
| balderdash 0 23 | non sequitur 0 92 |
| to do with os/2 3 378 |
+------------------------------+------------------------------+
tholenator v1.3 by Sandman
.
- References:
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453980
- From: Sandman
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453984
- From: Sandman
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453985
- From: Sandman
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453986
- From: Sandman
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453987
- From: Sandman
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453988
- From: Sandman
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453980
- Prev by Date: Re: OS/2 newsgroup poll
- Next by Date: Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453990
- Previous by thread: Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453988
- Next by thread: Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453990
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
