Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?

Elizabot v2.0.3 wrote:
tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Elizabot writes:

Sandman wrote:

Tholenator summary of meaningless replies:
------------------------------------------------------------

comprehension 2 139 |illogic 0 147
irrelevant 0 206 |liar 0 27
pontification 0 26 |classic 1 385
how ironic 0 122 |unsubstantiated 0 532
erroneous 0 757 |burden of proof 0 29
no surprise 0 111 |given that 1 122
presupposing 0 232 |allege 0 143
basis 0 166 |unnecessary 0 65
balderdash 0 23 |non sequitur 0 54
to do with os/2 1 112 |
------------------------------------------------------------

tholenator v1.2 by Sandman

How about "part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", "Note: No Response"

What does that have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?

You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.

Note: No response.
.

Relevant Pages