Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453927

tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote in
<qrwsg.22637$Z67.1856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

[6565] Classic (1220) erroneous (1662) presupposition of harassment
[6565] on my part, Sandman.

On what basis do you call it a classic erroneous presupposition of
harassment on your part, Sandman?

[6566] Rather ironic, coming from someone who jumped into a thread
[6566] for the sole purpose of harassing me.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

[6567] Classic (1221) erroneous (1663) presupposition.

On what basis do you call it a classic erroneous presupposition?

[6568] What is a "Tholenator summary", Sandman, and what does it
[6568] have to do with OS/2 (277)?

What does your harassment have to do with OS/2?

[6569] It never ceases to amaze me just how stupid you think
[6569] readers are, Sandman.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. It is quite clear that I
think only you are stupid, since you're a hideous troll that has no
other objective but to harass me.

[6570] Anyone with decent reading comprehension (7338) skills can
[6570] see right through your game, where you harass and then
[6570] pretend to be the injured party.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim and rather ironic coming
from you, who harass me and then pretend you're not harassing me and
that it's me who is harassing you instead. I don't know who you think
you are fooling.

Have you ever noticed that there is never anyone that comes to your
support?


Tholenator summary of meaningless replies:
+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| comprehension 1 7339 | illogic 0 159 |
| irrelevant 0 212 | liar 0 39 |
| pontification 0 26 | classic 2 1223 |
| how ironic 0 124 | unsubstantiated 0 1298 |
| erroneous 2 1665 | burden of proof 0 29 |
| no surprise 0 125 | given that 0 314 |
| presupposing 0 232 | allege 0 337 |
| basis 0 622 | unnecessary 0 65 |
| balderdash 0 23 | non sequitur 0 88 |
| to do with os/2 1 278 |
+------------------------------+------------------------------+
tholenator v1.3 by Sandman
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?
    ... Sandman. ... What does that have to do with OS/2? ... On what basis do you call it a classic erroneous presupposition? ...
    (comp.os.os2.advocacy)
  • Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453940
    ... harassment of me, Sandman. ... On what basis do you call it a classic erroneous presupposition? ... Tholenator summary of meaningless replies: ...
    (comp.os.os2.advocacy)
  • Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?
    ... Sandman. ... Classic erroneous presupposition that I've been harassing you, ... been trolling this newsgroup, as evidenced by the fact that he ...
    (comp.os.os2.advocacy)
  • Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?
    ... On what basis do you call it a classic erroneous presupposition? ... represent the substantiation, Sandman. ... On what basis do you call it a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous ... someone who has been harasssing me, ...
    (comp.os.os2.advocacy)
  • Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?
    ... On what basis do you call it a classic erroneous presupposition of ... On what basis do you call it a classic hypocrisy, ... hijacked the conversation you was having with Leauki just to harass ... me, Sandman? ...
    (comp.os.os2.advocacy)