Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?
- From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 09:35:50 GMT
Elizabot writes:
Sandman wrote:
Tholenator summary of meaningless replies:
------------------------------------------------------------
comprehension 2 139 |illogic 0 147
irrelevant 0 206 |liar 0 27
pontification 0 26 |classic 1 385
how ironic 0 122 |unsubstantiated 0 532
erroneous 0 757 |burden of proof 0 29
no surprise 0 111 |given that 1 122
presupposing 0 232 |allege 0 143
basis 0 166 |unnecessary 0 65
balderdash 0 23 |non sequitur 0 54
to do with os/2 1 112 |
------------------------------------------------------------
tholenator v1.2 by Sandman
How about "part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", "Note: No Response"
What does that have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
You would know, Tholen, had you better reading comprehension skills.
How would better reading comprehension skills suddenly make either
"part", "endure", "harass", "antagon*", or "Note: No Response"
something to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
.
- References:
- Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?
- From: Elizabot v2.0.3
- Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?
- Prev by Date: Re: Haiku Knockout Competition
- Next by Date: Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?
- Previous by thread: Re: how did Microsoft break away from OS/2?
- Next by thread: Re: Haiku Knockout Competition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|