Re: reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- From: Jose Miguel Pérez <NOSPAM_josemiguel_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:02:30 GMT
Nick Müller writes:
That's a very crude way of doing this. Consider using a proper serial port communication library. There's about a handful available for DJGPP on the ftp servers.
The way is "crude", but it's the way the OS supports. I think that fiddling with hardware is not the right way to go. I have looked at the libs, and decided not to use them because of this. If my way is a failure, I still can fix it. It's just one of my libs to be changed and the serial lib to be added. No big pain.
From my years of MS-DOS serial programming, I never used the DOS support forserial communications. Moreover, I have seen very few serious serial comm program or library that used the OS "standard" way of doing serial communications. Don't get me wrong, you can stay using it but it's just to point out that in the MS-DOS case, not using the standard is "the standard". :-) You will miss error checking, full duplex, and many other things.
You get _what_? What's '16382 CHRO' supposed to be?
16382 times a "char = 0". Not a "O" as you quoted.
What were you expecting? 16384 bytes? 16382 exactly?
This is what you get when the speed doesn't match, if I'm not wrong, this is exactly what happens when you have set your program at a lower speed (i.e: 9600) and you get the data at higher speed. Do you get parity errors? Frame errors? May be you're setting the speed right with the MODE command, but you may need to check also the speed settings from the Windows environment. Note that the XP DOS box is a fully virtual environment, the DOS box isn't talking to the real UART. Maybe (I don't know for sure) the Windows system is not setting the right speed, no matter what the MODE command said.
That's about as hostile an environment as you could come up with.
ACK. But that's what I have.
Does your program works from plain DOS? Try to isolate the problem, check if your program works in plain DOS but not in Windows.
Cheers, Jose Miguel.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- From: Nick Müller
- Re: reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- References:
- reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- From: Nick Müller
- Re: reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker
- Re: reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- From: Nick Müller
- reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- Prev by Date: Re: reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- Next by Date: Re: reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- Previous by thread: Re: reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- Next by thread: Re: reading from com1: => driving me nuts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|