Re: Real newbie question

Hello, Axel!

That's strong, seeing that your indeosyncratic French spelling has
nearly nothing in common with that Hebrew origial, whose spelling in
any case was not fixed until much later than 3 ka ago, which
incidentally was the time of David and 500 a before the Babylonian
exile you refer to.

So yes, Peter has made a mistake, and yes, correcting him is alright,
but please accept that French spelling is neither logical nor obvious
to most people in the world (neither is German incidentally).

Ok, ok. That day, I had more energy than usual.

Regarding the spelling of French, it comes directly from the Romans
(by the way, when the Arabs designate all the "Europeans" as "Roumi",
"Roumiya", etc, they mean, in reality, "Romans". Islam was created in
622 but never noticed that the Roman empire crumbled in 400, 2
centuries before. 1400 years later, Arabs are still calling us
"Romans"). One consequence of this is that the French language still
has 6 conjugaisons of each verb (while English only has 2: adding an
"s" to the verb if the subject is a person, or using the verb as is)
because the Romans had 8 (in addition to male / femal conjugaisons,
they also had a neutral case, in plural and singular). In Europe,
there is a clear border in languages between those following the Roman
syntax (Italian, French, Spanish) and those following the tree of
languages coming from the ancestors of the Germans (English is
belonging to the German tree, despite having 1/3 of its vocabulary
using French words).

Re-reading what I wrote, I found an obvious error (shame to me!):
Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans in 62 AFTER "JC", not BEFORE. I
should have known, since I spent my youth reading the "History of the
War of the Jews" by Flavius Joseph. My Grand-Father had found it in a
second-hand book-shop, and bought it because of the drawings, that I
saw on the walls of his house for years. One of them was the Ark of
Noah, as seen in 1666. Very funny, when you compare it to the real Ark
of Noah, that tourists can see in Turkey! Another volume was missing,
that he never managed to find. This precise book was made in 1666 for
a French "abbaye" of the Catholic church, so was written using "f"
characters everywhere we now use "s" characters. When I was young, I
was wondering what it was meaning, so spent quite a lot of time
deciphering it. Flavius Joseph was a direct witness of the fall of
Jerusalem. He was a very bright Jew who was destined to become high
priest. After seeing Israel destroyed before his eyes, he went to Roma
and become an historian. He then wrote this book (among others)
detailing in incredible precision everything that had happened in
Israel the 300 years before its fall. This book was so highly prized
that the Catholic church had it recopied during 1,500 years: that's
why it survived. Everytime you see the expression "the fifth Gospel",
it is a reference to this book. One day, someone realized that he was
25 years in 62, so should have been born circa 40, that is to say:
around the date when Jesus-Christ was crucified (since Jesus-Christ
was 33 when he died). The problem being that this man who was a direct
witness of the events of that time, and was a very high-level member
of the Jewish clergy of that time, never mention Jesus-Christ or
anything remotely called "Catholic" or "Christian". At his time, books
were never finished, so he kept improving his books all the rest of
his life. He is no longer mentioned after circa 80. So, from 62 to 80,
a Jewish historian who knew everything that had happened during the
last 300 years in his native country had never heard about Jesus-
Christ. So, the only solution is that the Catholic church was created
AFTER 80. This would explain the contradictions in the four Gospels,
since none of them say the same thing. Also, the Catholic religion
"New Gospel" was written in Greek, and started in Roma, so it would be
no wonder, then, that they would made errors about what had happened
in Israel one century before, since they were not there, at the time.

Yours Sincerely,
Mr Emmanuel Roche

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: History of French
    ... > Is there not a clas of words in English whose spellings were ... > this is equivalent to the objection above) and the spelling 'sept' was the ... > Greek or Latin sources, preserve approximations to Greek and Latin spelling ... I can think of is to compare French with Italian. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Lens history question?
    ... French) and Americans "Check". ... The teacher claimed she had no idea what the character meant. ... I sided with the teacher on that; but little things like spelling are not relavant to the goal of the class. ... My son is quite the mathematician, but he is also sloppy in execution... ...
    (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
  • Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
    ... The bestest froggiest cheese-eating-surrender-monkiest French name ... involves molecular interactions and statistical mechanics of molecular ... In view of your imaginative spelling in English, ... I think all great scientists use intuition. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: homo(phones/graphs/nyms)
    ... >> languages like English or French with their strange and unsystematic ... >> spelling conventions. ... Old-French started out with a spelling that fitted the language of the ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Bob Graham - senate vote giving Bush authority for Iraq
    ... >I'm sure 5th century Romans had similar arguments about the intentions ... I will be glad to stipulate that France is an unusually ... kings by such names as Charles the Bald and Louis the Fat ... Do you think that maybe her mother was French? ...
    (soc.retirement)