Cisco routers "know" better :-) [was: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately]
- From: Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:31:45 +0200
"David F. Skoll" <dfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Per Hedeland wrote:
If the client (correctly) advertises the size on the MAIL command as
specified in the SIZE SMTP extension, sendmail will reject the message
at that point.
Note that even if the client is willing to do this, if you put a
*$&&*%$ Cisco router in between Sendmail and the client, the #*$&*&#$
Cisco router may block Sendmail's "ESMTP" banner and may ALSO block the
client's "EHLO" forcing it to fall back on "HELO" and no SMTP extensions.
Did I mention my feelings about #*&$*#$ Cisco?
You have not ;-)
--
[pl>en Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi@xxxxxxxxxxxx : anfi@xxxxxxxx
It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one.
-- Phil White
.
- References:
- MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- From: RICCARDO
- Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- From: Per Hedeland
- Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- From: David F. Skoll
- MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- Prev by Date: Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- Next by Date: Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- Previous by thread: Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- Next by thread: Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading