Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- From: "David F. Skoll" <dfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:23:01 -0400
Per Hedeland wrote:
If the client (correctly) advertises the size on the MAIL command as
specified in the SIZE SMTP extension, sendmail will reject the message
at that point.
Note that even if the client is willing to do this, if you put a
*$&&*%$ Cisco router in between Sendmail and the client, the #*$&*&#$
Cisco router may block Sendmail's "ESMTP" banner and may ALSO block the
client's "EHLO" forcing it to fall back on "HELO" and no SMTP extensions.
Did I mention my feelings about #*&$*#$ Cisco?
Regards,
David.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- From: Clemens Zauner
- Cisco routers "know" better :-) [was: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately]
- From: Andrzej Adam Filip
- Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- References:
- MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- From: RICCARDO
- Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- From: Per Hedeland
- MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- Prev by Date: Re: Solaris 10: where to put SMART_HOST and MASQUERADE_AS?
- Next by Date: Cisco routers "know" better :-) [was: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately]
- Previous by thread: Re: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately
- Next by thread: Cisco routers "know" better :-) [was: MaxMessageSize: reject immediately]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading