Re: Spam blocking with port 587
- From: Rick Knight <rick_knight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:34:59 GMT
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:36:36 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
Rick Knight wrote:
I've just removed MIMEDefang from my server because it prevents
SpamAssassin from using it's more advanced filters.
??? Eh? Could you explain that? MIMEDefang doesn't "prevent" anything.
It's up to you to code your policy.
Regards,
David.
David,
Thanks for this reply.
MIMEDefang is a great tool and I've been using it for years. My spam
problem has gotten so bad lately though that MD/SA was no longer doing
enough. I decided to add the SARE rules to SA but could not get them to
work. After doing a lot of research I determined the reason I couldn't get
the SARE rules working was that MD runs SpamAssassin. The SARE rules need
to be run by Spamc and Spamd. MD Does not run Spamc/Spamd. I found some
howtos to get MD to support spamc/spamd, but could not get them working.
As I recall, one of the howtos referred to a comment by you, that support
for spamc/spamd was not working in MD or was week at best. Has that
changed? Is it possible to get MD to call Spamc/Spamd and thereby support
all SpamAssassin features? If so, please point me to some documentation or
a howto.
Thanks again,
Rick
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spam blocking with port 587
- From: ska
- Re: Spam blocking with port 587
- From: David F. Skoll
- Re: Spam blocking with port 587
- References:
- Spam blocking with port 587
- From: Rick Knight
- Re: Spam blocking with port 587
- From: J.O. Aho
- Re: Spam blocking with port 587
- From: Rick Knight
- Re: Spam blocking with port 587
- From: David F. Skoll
- Spam blocking with port 587
- Prev by Date: Re: SMTP AUTH v. POP before SMTP
- Next by Date: Re: SMTP AUTH v. POP before SMTP
- Previous by thread: Re: SpamAssassin and MIMEDefang milter [Was: Spam blocking with port 587]
- Next by thread: Re: Spam blocking with port 587
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
