Re: sendmail to ISP's authenticated SMTP
- From: Res <res@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 08:18:14 +1000 (EST)
On Sun, 10 Mar 2007, Ralph B wrote:
On Mar 10, 9:08 pm, p...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Per Hedeland) wrote:
Perhaps you can clarify, preferrably by example, why you think you're
allowing relaying - the reference in your earlier post was quite
unclear. Maybe you're just receiving backscatter from someone else's
attempts with your address as the forged sender?
It was the relay test at http://www.abuse.net/relay.html that told me
I might be relaying. However, that (as I explain in a post which
crossed yours) was because I stupidly registered at abuse.net with an
address that lay in one of my domains. So it was not bounced as
abuse.net was checking for.
I am now reasonably confident that I am not running an open relay.
http://its.ausics.net you can open relay test from there if you want
another test.
--
Cheers
Res
Let Novell known what you think of their back door deal with the devil.
Sign the petition today: http://techp.org/p/1/
.
- References:
- Re: sendmail to ISP's authenticated SMTP
- From: Ralph B
- Re: sendmail to ISP's authenticated SMTP
- From: Per Hedeland
- Re: sendmail to ISP's authenticated SMTP
- From: Ralph B
- Re: sendmail to ISP's authenticated SMTP
- From: Per Hedeland
- Re: sendmail to ISP's authenticated SMTP
- From: Ralph B
- Re: sendmail to ISP's authenticated SMTP
- Prev by Date: Re: sendmail under attack
- Next by Date: Re: sendmail under attack
- Previous by thread: Re: sendmail to ISP's authenticated SMTP
- Next by thread: Re: sendmail to ISP's authenticated SMTP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading