Re: Beating the spam filter ...
- From: "Taylor, Grant" <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:29:19 -0500
base60 wrote:
You'll note in the MX section that your MX record points to
a CNAME (alias).
Also note that this is considered illegal.
I would say that using a CNAME as an MX record is more frowned upon than illegal as this is a commonly accepted practice. The most important thing is that the MX record resolve to a name, not an IP, like some domains I've had to brow beat administrators of.
Both, your opinion and mine are just a couple of the predominant schools of thought on this issue.
Grant. . . .
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Beating the spam filter ...
- From: Bill Cole
- Re: Beating the spam filter ...
- From: base60
- Re: Beating the spam filter ...
- Prev by Date: Re: Upgrading Sendmail
- Next by Date: Re: Upgrading Sendmail
- Previous by thread: Re: Beating the spam filter ...
- Next by thread: Re: Beating the spam filter ...
- Index(es):