Re: smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- From: Claus Aßmann <ca+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@mine.informatik.uni-kiel.de>
- Date: 19 Apr 2006 16:15:03 GMT
jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
Ok but as I can see in the maillog the alias is expanded , and
myserver.mydomain ( machine wich received the mail) is unconditional
appended to the alias ( with my code or with sockmapsrv) :
I just tried it and added:
, 'user3' => '<ext3@xxxxxxxxx>'
to my %amapping in libsmmap/t-sockmapsrv.pl. That works as expected.
alias=<wolter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@myserver.mydomain>
That most likely means that the RHS of the map is incorrect. See
"Aliases" in README:
The value (RHS) for an alias entry is a list of one or more RFC 2821
addresses (including the angle brackets) ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
On the other hand t-sockmapsrv.pl answers
(sizeod address):OK adr2@dom2,
The comma seems to be mandatory
Yes, it's in the protocol specification. However, the RHS itself
(ignoring the protocol data around it) must be:
<adr2@dom2>
If this still fails, please give one "real" example (your error
above uses "wolter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" and the protocol example
uses "adr2@dom2" which is confusing).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- From: jeanmarc.pouchoulon
- Re: smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- References:
- smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- From: jeanmarc.pouchoulon
- Re: smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- From: jeanmarc.pouchoulon
- Re: smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- From: Claus Aßmann
- Re: smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- From: jean-marc pouchoulon
- smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- Prev by Date: procmailrc weirdness
- Next by Date: dbm map "Alias0": unsafe map file
- Previous by thread: Re: smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- Next by thread: Re: smx-0.0.0.0 smar defunct with map socket aliases
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|