Re: Problem with SMTP protocol


"Sebastian Jaenicke" <sjaenick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió en el
mensaje news:slrndlg9fl.qc.sjaenick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Doesn't matter, the commands are still invalid. Read the RFC.
>
> Oh, and don't top-post if you want answers.
>
> --
> Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from
> smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front
> of smart terminals.
> -- obs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The commands *are* valid. All I had to do in order to get the mail sent and
solve the problem was adding a pair of new lines to the DATA section (a
"From: " and a "Date :" lines), and inserting a blank line between that and
the message content.

Thanks in any case


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Trust us!
    ... Jung znxrf lbh fb fher nobhg gung? ... Progress: The process through which Usenet has evolved from ... smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front ... of smart terminals. ...
    (alt.sysadmin.recovery)
  • Re: Rejecting mails on content in Message-ID
    ... > Progress: The process through which Usenet has evolved from ... > smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front ... > of smart terminals. ...
    (comp.mail.sendmail)
  • Re: Bastard Powerbook From Hell
    ... a yellow license plate. ... Progress: The process through which Usenet has evolved from ... smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front ... of smart terminals. ...
    (alt.sysadmin.recovery)
  • Re: Problem with SMTP protocol
    ... the commands are still invalid. ... Progress: The process through which Usenet has evolved from ... smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front ... of smart terminals. ...
    (comp.mail.sendmail)
  • Re: Securing Solaris 10
    ... Progress: The process through which Usenet has evolved from ... smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front ... of smart terminals. ...
    (Focus-SUN)