Re: Recent NANAE Flood (was Re: Famous Hacker Uses Challenge-Responses)
- From: Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:52:43 GMT
On comp.mail.misc, in <ZXove.12078$VK4.3133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Alan Connor" wrote:
>
>
> On comp.mail.misc, in
><kv1sb15edb1ppjbj9mp6p1j7slt187vctp@xxxxxxx>, "Steve Baker"
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:56:27 -0700, Mark Crispin
>><mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> [snip excellent article]
>>
>> He's talking about you, Sam. Playing with Beavis is
>> fine,
>
> How does he "play with me"? I don't ever read his posts.
> I wouldn't even know he calls me "Beavis" if someone hadn't
> told me in an email.
>
> All he does is play with himself.
>
>> but you can be just as rude to an innocent poster as
>> Beavis.
>
> And YOU can be a complete ***.
>
>> Comp.mail.MISC implies that newbie questions should be
>> welcomed, not ridiculed.
>>
>> Steve Baker
>
> They also should be able to obtain accurate information about
> everything to do with electronic mail.
>
> And the amount of mis/dis-information you and others here
> have posted about Challenge-Response mail filters is
> staggering.
>
> Of course, it hasn't worked at all. Challenge-Response filters
> become more and more popular every day.
>
> They are hated by spammers and people who hire spammers, and
> people who make a living as spam-fighting professionals,
> because they are so easy to use and because the spammers
> can't beat them.
>
> Trolls hate them too, because they reject anonymous mail.
>
> Have you noticed that the amount of pro-C/R material on the
> Web now vastly overwhelms the amount of dis-information posted
> by pro-spammers? Wasn't like that a few years ago.
>
> While you and your pro-spam cohorts have been attacking me
> here, I have been posting C/R FAQ's all over the Usenet.
> For years.
>
> Careful, scripted, multi-posting. From different servers and
> in dozens of different formats and on very irregular schedules
> and with different aliases. A lot of them disguised as ordinary
> posts. All with the X-No-Archive: yes header, to avoid leaving
> tracks.
>
> On tens of thousands of newsgroups, Though never on the mail
> groups: Most of the people that hang out there are spammers,
> anyway.
>
> The FAQ contains links to all of the available software and ISPs
> that offer C/R service, and to the pro-C/R websites, just for
> starters. The disguised ones had a link to the real FAQ.
> People who were interested just copied the posts or the link(s).
> Thousands of them have mailed me at one of my dozens of email
> addresses. (The one I post in my sig here is just another trick
> to keep you feebs distracted. I don't get ANY important mail
> there.)
>
> You are SO fucking stupid.
>
> Like all spammers and trolls.
>
> All I had to do to distract you was pretend like I cared about
> the transparent lies you all have been posting, or post
> something from one of the pro-C/R websites.
>
> But the war is over. You've lost.
>
> Kiss my ass. Again.
>
> AC
>
> --
> alanconnor AT earthlink DOT net
> Use your real return address or I'll never know you
> even tried to mail me. http://tinyurl.com/2t5kp
> ~
What the hell. The war is over. Here's how I did it, Fools:
Post number one (aliase one, newsserver one) to new group:
"I know this is off-topic, but we are all on the
internet, right?
Does ANYONE know any good programs for getting rid of the
spam?
It is driving me CRAZY."
Wait for responses, reply with alias one, who knows nothing
about email, wait for 3000-5000 minutes.
Post number two (aliase two, newsserver two):
"I hear that Spamassassin (etc.) is pretty good....."
Wait for responses, reply with alias one and two.
Post number three (aliase three, newsserver three):
"I gotta tell you that I've tried everything, and
the only ones that work are these:
<http://......>
A dozen variations on the above. A dozen different
links to the FAQ(s).
All done with a script I wrote. No work at all. I'd
just take a look at the last time I ran it, and if it
seemed right, run it again, with the number of new
groups to take next from the randomized list the only
commandline option.
Which left me free to keep you clowns busy here.
:-)
Thank you Sun-Tzu.
--
Please visit my home page:
http://angel.1jh.com./nanae/kooks/alanconnor.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Recent NANAE Flood (was Re: Famous Hacker Uses Challenge-Responses)
- From: Steve Baker
- Re: Recent NANAE Flood (was Re: Famous Hacker Uses Challenge-Responses)
- From: Alan Connor
- Re: Recent NANAE Flood (was Re: Famous Hacker Uses Challenge-Responses)
- Prev by Date: Re: Recent NANAE Flood (was Re: Famous Hacker Uses Challenge-Responses)
- Next by Date: Re: Recent NANAE Flood (was Re: Famous Hacker Uses Challenge-Responses)
- Previous by thread: Re: Recent NANAE Flood (was Re: Famous Hacker Uses Challenge-Responses)
- Next by thread: Alan Connor, Usenet Beavis (was Re: Recent NANAE Flood)
- Index(es):