Re: email verification

"Andrew Starr" <atsnntp1204@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:atsnntp1204-41B1AC.18070008072005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <fNrze.2187$R5.413@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Rogier Schoenmakers" <rogierschoenmakers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> We want to check each email being sent by some people to go via a "legal
>> expert" person to check and see if anything the person has written in the
>> email is dangerous to the company. What this "legal expert" should be
>> doing
>> is just accepting or denying an email by reading it and clicking on
>> "accept
>> / deny" or so. The company is only 20 people big of which about 14 people
>> need to be checked (if possible).
>
> I've got to update/delete links on this page, but see:
> http://www.emailman.com/security/content.html
>
> Perhaps such a solution?
>
yikes! A lot there, not sure if it is there what I'm looking for. I'll have
a look and let you know if there's something I can use.
Thanks eitherway!

Rogier.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bernie back 1 year 2 mil
    ... Going to camp with Felix Escalona as the top choice for backup ... Yikes! ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees)
  • Re: TA DA! (New Bracelet and some other ramblings)
    ... And can you imagine Linda Harmeyer's response, ... YIKES ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.crafts.beads)
  • Re: VB shift operator >>
    ... All that code to replace what should be 1 cpu instruction!! ... MicroDexterity Inc ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: WB Looney Box 3?
    ... Yikes! ... >Kip Williams wrote: ... >Derek Janssen (and it was worth waiting two months since the original ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.arts.animation)
  • Re: Bush
    ... Variant 136 ... Eitherway; more political ... [Expletive deleted by server.] ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.humour)
Loading