Re: Mulberry gone, now what?
- From: usenet@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 7 Oct 2005 08:30:12 GMT
kael <kael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yiorgos Adamopoulos wrote:
> > As you may have seen from http://www.mulberrymail.com/ ISAMET has gone
> > bankrupt. So now what is left to be a decent Win32 IMAP GUI client?
>
> Polymer, currently in development, is a cross-plateform ACAP/IMAP GUI
> client - <http://dave.cridland.net/acap/polymer.html> ; it's probably
> the third real IMAP client, after Pine and Mulberry (okay, I'm missing
> Cone and Mutt).
>
.... and suffers from the same problem as virtually every other IMAP
client out there - it works best with a limited range of IMAP servers.
Personally I think this is the fundamental flaw in IMAP, it's not
tightly enough specified so IMAP servers vary quite a lot with the
result that it's well nigh impossible to write an IMAP client that
works well with them all.
I use mutt and, while it is a reasonably functional IMAP client, I
find that it is so much pleasanter to use with local mail files I just
about never use mutt with IMAP.
I get similar capability to IMAP by running mutt remotely (via ssh) so
I can see and manage the same mail folders etc. wherever I am working
from.
--
Chris Green
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mulberry gone, now what?
- From: Mark Crispin
- Re: Mulberry gone, now what?
- References:
- Mulberry gone, now what?
- From: Yiorgos Adamopoulos
- Re: Mulberry gone, now what?
- From: kael
- Mulberry gone, now what?
- Prev by Date: Re: Send mails in Outlook -will not archived in IMAP
- Next by Date: HELP: Cyrus-IMAP + SASL2
- Previous by thread: Re: Mulberry gone, now what?
- Next by thread: Re: Mulberry gone, now what?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|