Re: VHDL Newbie - Is this a valid statement?
- From: "nigel502@xxxxxxxxx" <nigel502@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jun 2006 05:24:46 -0700
have a nice synthesis
All,
Thank you very much for your help - I didn't realize it until I read
this last line that I hadn't included these signals in my synthesis,
and that was why my FSM was constantly looping when I synthesis.
Once again, thank you all for you quick responses,
nigel
backhus wrote:
Hi Nigel,
your source snippet seems to be ok. If your design isn't time critical
you can leave it the way it is.
To use a reset inside a design as a control signal is a philosophical
question.
But doing the compare inside your fsm increases the number of inputs
unnecessary. Better do that inside your counter and generate a
(synchronous) CountEnd signal there. This may speed up your FSM a little.
Comparing signals to constants is very common in VHDL. If your counter
has only four bits anyway it's sufficient to write
if(counter_q = "1101") THEN
...
end if;
One thing that may bother you is the chosen value. Is cnt_rst a
synchronous or an asynchronous input to the counter? If it's a
synchronous reset your counter may stay one count behind the expected
value (pipelinig effect, check your simulation). To overcome this you
can simply reduce the compare constant.
have a nice synthesis
Eilert
nigel502@xxxxxxxxx schrieb:
Hello,
My goal is to make a step in my FSM that loops until my counter reaches
it's desired value and then moves to it's next step - however I am
having issues detecting it reaching that desired value. I'm assuming
that something is wrong with my conditional statement. Can you compare
a signal against a constant value in VHDL
signal counter_q: std_logic_vector(3 downto 0);
.....
when read_del =>
cnt_rst <='0'; -- signal to reset counter - keep low here
if(counter_q(3 downto 0) = "1101") THEN
next_state <= blah;
else
next_state <= read_del;
end if;
What is the proper way to preform this action?
Thanks in advance
.
- References:
- VHDL Newbie - Is this a valid statement?
- From: nigel502@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: VHDL Newbie - Is this a valid statement?
- From: backhus
- VHDL Newbie - Is this a valid statement?
- Prev by Date: Re: Summarise the points needed for AHB Slave Interface Implementation
- Next by Date: Re: Who can explain the bit'pos for me?
- Previous by thread: Re: VHDL Newbie - Is this a valid statement?
- Next by thread: Who can explain the bit'pos for me?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|