Re: [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- From: "Charlie Adams" <c-adams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:12:53 -0500
Thomas,
I can't thank you enough. This is exactly what I needed.
I played around with a few combinations on the connection string and
eventually got it right. But I was getting an error: User not associated
with a trusted SQL Server connection. So, I googled the error string and
found that I needed to open up authentication to SQL Server and Windows NT,
which I did using the Enterprise Manager.
But I still got the error message. So, I dug some more. On
www.windowsitpro.com, I read a response to the solution above that mentioned
using a utility called cliconfg.exe. Then by putting NamedPipes ahead of
TCP/IP (don't ask me what this means), I finally got it to work.
Admittedly, my 20 year career has been blissfully ignorant of databases in
general and I am now forced to broach the subject, but this last little bit
of solution seems terribly obscure.
At any rate, thanks again. I now have direct connection to an SQL Server
database w/o defining a data source.
Regards,
Charlie
"Thomas Brodt" <thomas.brodt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43311137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi Charlie,
>
> Well, there are differences for database connects. Each one uses different
> informations in its connect strings).
>
> Postgres Connect using the PostgresEXDIConnection doesn't need a
> datasource (which is ODBC specific, not native postgres) nor does it need
> any database specific odbc drivers. You can directly connect to postgres
> using a socket connection which is not common for all database clients.
> Other databases use vendor specific database client dlls, as e.g. Oracle,
> Sybase, DB2, informix and others.
>
> alternatively you can connect to postgres (or any other database that
> provides odbc drivers) using an odbc driver. then you are bound to the
> odbc protocol which should be a unifying standard across different
> database vendors. Communication then goes from vw via this driver to the
> database, not directly as above. odbc is a translation layer between the
> application that uses odbc and the vendor specific database protocol.
>
> Normally you define an odbc data source for a connection to a whatever
> database. This name can then be used, because the odbc driver manager is
> then responsible for translation of this name to make a connection. It
> looks up all the settings and specifics defined for the data source, which
> includes what database type and driver is being used.
>
> the need to define a datasource for odbc can be omitted if you provide all
> settings - that you make when defining a data source in the driver
> manager - in the connect string.
>
> a possible connect to Informix via odbc without a data source is e.g.
> "DRIVER={IBM INFORMIX 3.82 32 BIT};DB=ultimate;UID=whoever;PWD=secret;
> SERVER=ol_serv1;HOST=serv1;SERVICE=turbo;PRO=onsoctcp;
> TDLL=C:\Programme\Informix\Client-SDK\bin\igo4n304.dll;"
>
> This defines all settings normally configured for a datasource. the name
> of the driver is that one that is displayed when choosing the database
> type in odbc.
>
> in VW, the class ODBCConnection uses a different connection scheme if
> DRIVER={ is given in the connect string, using SQLDriverConnect instead of
> SQLConnect. (See method useDriverConnect: there)
>
> Using MS SQLServer, it sould be DRIVER={SQL Server};DB=xxx;UID=......
>
> Providing this as connect string for an odbc connection should connect
> directly to SQLserver without the need for a defined DSN.
>
> We currently connect only to Informix (via ODBC driver) using this scheme,
> so I cannot provide any specifics for SQL Server, just that it should work
> as it does for Informix. We never define a DSN for our access to Informix,
> we just use the way described above.
>
> Thomas
>
> BTW: Even StroeForSQLServer should be able to connect using driverConnect
> without a defined DSN if the settings string is set up correctly.
>
> Charlie Adams schrieb:
>> OK, I've browsed the vwnc mailing list archives and apparently that is
>> just the way StoreForSQLServer works. You must declare a data source
>> through Windows' ODBC Data Source Administrator. PostgreSQL opens a
>> socket and converses directly. This must be the lone exception for
>> Windows-based DB access.
>>
>> What bothers me is that it was so difficult to divine.
>>
>> "Charlie Adams" <c-adams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:43302363$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>In looking at PostgreSQLEXDIConnection, it would appear to do what I
>>>need. It takes an environment string, ex. 'hostName:port_dBName', and
>>>connects straight through to the machine -- no data source required.
>>>
>>>Is it possible to achieve this behavior with an ODBCConnection? It seems
>>>to only work with data sources.
>>>
>>>"Thomas Brodt" <thomas.brodt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:432fc8cb$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>>AFAIK, the DRIVER must be given in {} and it must be first in the
>>>>parameter string, so you should begin with 'DRIVER={don't know what SQL
>>>>Server has to look like};UID=.....'.
>>>>
>>>>You should also verify that in odbcconnection you use the path using the
>>>>SQL*Driver*Connect call, not the regular SQLConnect which uses data
>>>>source names.
>>>>
>>>>HTH
>>>>Thomas
>>>>
>>>>Charlie Adams schrieb:
>>>>
>>>>>In WinXP Pro and VW 7.3.1, it appears that I cannot create a valid
>>>>>ODBCConnection object without building an ODBC Data Source using the
>>>>>ODBC Data Source Administrator from Windows Admin Tools. Is that right?
>>>>>
>>>>>I want to connect to my version 7.0 SQL Server directly and attach to a
>>>>>database there. But it seems I must build the interim data source
>>>>>object to get there. My customer chafes at this saying his Java program
>>>>>uses a connection string of the sort:
>>>>>
>>>>>Driver=SQL
>>>>>Server;Server=myMachine;Database=SomeDBName;Uid=myUserID;Pwd=aPsswrd
>>>>>
>>>>>and this negates the need to define a data source. I don't see the
>>>>>magic I need from the DatabaseAppDevGuide.pdf.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
.
- References:
- [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- From: Charlie Adams
- Re: [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- From: Thomas Brodt
- Re: [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- From: Charlie Adams
- Re: [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- From: Charlie Adams
- Re: [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- From: Thomas Brodt
- [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- Prev by Date: Re: What dev tool chain would you use?
- Next by Date: Re: [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- Previous by thread: Re: [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- Next by thread: Re: [VW 7.3.1] ODBCConnection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|